ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending fi nancial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's fi nancial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3264|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 CR89 关于DE错误原因的个人意见

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-2-11 12:20:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
89. Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that, sincetop executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that the argument seeks to establish

这都题的逻辑结构已经讨论了很多了
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-803570-1-1.html?postid=17580090&searchmode=TopicContent&searchtext=Since%20it%20has%20become
这个帖子中1369179610同学解释的非常清晰。
这里我想说的是对于DE选项的一点个人看法。因为我一开始就选的D和E
我感觉DE错在第一句话,The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain,因为这个题目的逻辑意思是表达作者的观点Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic。而不是想解释several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank,这个背景。当然,既然DE的第一句话就错了,第二句说作者想给自己的解释提供论据也是错的了。
不知道自己这个观点对不对~~希望大家看看~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-5-18 14:37:03 | 只看该作者
嘛 但是整个argument确实是围绕这高管买股票这个事展开的  要说argument是想解释这个情况也说的过去
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 05:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部