prep2012 CR 036 求逻辑大牛回答~~~~~~~

冰剑幽蓝

A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions.If this change were adopted,wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions.Therefore,many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services,and some would have to close their doors.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
A Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws,at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
B Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
C The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
D Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
E Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income

这题B，D为什么不对？
B不是说这个资金是the only source of funding吗？
而D说wealthy individual是the only individual去捐赠
我觉得B，D应该都正确的

冰剑幽蓝

顶一下

riverwind91

only source和only individual不是一回事，source还可以包括企业捐助，政府捐助等。
你可以这么理解：假如D是正确的，即有钱人是唯一个人捐助者。在此假设下，公益组织一定会因为缺钱而倒闭么？

我的NGO个人捐款占比只有10%，那么这个新个税法对我的影响就微乎其微了。

因此还是B项更切中要害。

冰剑幽蓝

问题是。。。答案是A。。。我实在没弄明白~~

eyuanxu

不捐款是导致结论的主要原因
即使这些人是慈善机构的唯一经济来源
如果新政策对捐款行为没有影响不会导致结论发生

孟小彩

eyuanxu 发表于 2013-8-10 21:14
不捐款是导致结论的主要原因
即使这些人是慈善机构的唯一经济来源
如果新政策对捐款行为没有影响不会导致结 ...

!!!瞬间懂了！好顶赞

enkyklios

之之之之之之