- UID
- 822443
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-10-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women. //(第一层:文章主旨句,点明中心思想,表明本文将比较二部作品的写作手法)Buel and Buel’s(出现人物名,注意) biography of Mary Fish (1736-1818) makes little effort (负评价词)to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, (出现人物名,注意) meanwhile(结构词,后引出与Buel and Buel’s写法的不同), attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status on the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century(注意,与18世纪对比)//(第二层:对比Buel&Lebsock 写作方式的不同,注意作者态度倾向于Lebsock)Although(结构词,表让步) both(二本书的共同之处) books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only(表转折) Lebsock’s deals with it directly(正评价词). She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes(表观点的动词,后一般引出人物观点) that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly(表递进), she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example(第一遍读文时可略读), as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet(结构词,表转折) women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example.(举例 第一遍读文时可略读) In contrast(结构短语,表对比), Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians(插入语,可略读), of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.//(第三层:二位作者都涉及女性地位的争议,但具体描述Lebsock如何直接探讨这一争议;并简述Buel 写作手法的瑕疵) 逻辑简图:观点对比型 第一层:文章主旨句,点明中心思想,表明本文将比较二部作品的写作手法 第二层:对比Buel&Lebsock 写作方式的不同,注意作者态度倾向于Lebsock 第三层:二位作者都涉及女性地位的争议,但具体描述Lebsock如何直接探讨这一争议;并简述Buel 写作手法的瑕疵 1.The primary purpose of the passage is to(主旨题) A.examine two sides of a historiographical debate(不是检测历史辩论的二个方面,排除) B.call into question an author’s approach to a historiographical debate(不是质疑历史辩论的方式,排除) C.examine one author’s approach to a historiographical debate(不是检测历史辩论的方法,排除) D.discuss two authors’ works in relationship to a historiographical debate(正确) E.explain the prevalent perspective on a historiographical debate(解释史学研究辩论的普遍观点,无关解释,排除) 2.The author of the passage mentions the supervision of schools primarily in order to(细节题)回文定位至第三层for example 前面的句子 A.remind readers of the role education played in the cultural changes of the nineteenth century in the United States(无关education,排除) B.suggest an area in which nineteenth-century American women were relatively free to exercise power(无关area,排除) C.provide an example of an occupation for which accurate data about women’s participation are difficult to obtain(不是职业举例,排除) D.speculate about which occupations were considered suitable for United States women of the nineteenth century(无关推测,排除) E.illustrate how the answers to questions about women’s status depend on particular contexts(正确,she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference的同义改写) 3.With which of the following characterizations of Lebsock’s contribution to the controversy concerning women’s status in the nineteenth-century United States would the author of the passage be most likely to agree?(推理题) A.Lebsock has studied women from a formerly neglected region and time period.(与原文不符,排除) B.Lebsock has demonstrated the importance of frame of reference in answering questions about women’s status.(正确) C.Lebsock has addressed the controversy by using women’s current status as a frame of reference.(与原文不符,排除) D.Lebsock has analyzed statistics about occupations and property that were previously ignored.(与原文不符,排除) E.Lebsock has applied recent historiographical methods to the biography of a nineteenth century woman.(与原文不符,排除) 4.According to the passage, Lebsock’s work differs from Buel and Buel’s work in that Lebsock’s work(细节题)回文定位至第二层,注意是找Lebsock写法的特点 A.uses a large number of primary sources(这是Buel的写作特点,排除) B.ignores issues of women’s legal status(错误表述,排除) C.refuses to take a position on women’s status in the eighteenth century(与原文内容相反,排除) D.addresses larger historiographical issues(正确) E.fails to provide sufficient material to support its claims(文章未涉及,排除) 5.The passage suggests that Lebsock believes that compared to nineteenth-century American women, eighteenth-century American women were(对比题)回文定位至第三层,gained autonomy in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere.注意是选18世纪的女性地位特点 A.in many respects less powerful in relation to men(无关和men对比,排除) B.more likely to own real estate(无关real estate,排除) C.generally more economically independent(正确,19世纪女性更有个人自由但却不经济独立,相反18世纪女性更economically independent) D.more independent in conducting their private lives(这是19世纪女性特点,排除) E.less likely to work as school superintendents(无关 school superintendents,排除) |
|