|
以下是引用rosmarine在2006-5-31 14:02:00的发言：
可是，如果按D说的，作为tailor家庭成员而受雇的seamstress不享有seamstress guild的各种权利，那就说明这部分人不属seamstress guild权限管辖。这和文章末句矛盾。末句说这部分人到底属于哪个guild现在还不清楚。
作为tailor家庭成员而受雇的seamstress不属seamstress guild权限管辖。 To the tailors, their status as guild members overlapped with their role as heads of household, and entitled them (35) to employ as seamstresses female family members (注意这部分蓝字是个倒装语序)who did not marry outside the trade.以上说受雇的情况,受雇的seamstress是tailors雇佣的女性家庭成员; The seamstresses, however, viewed guild membership as (40) a mark of independence from the patriarchal family. Their guild was composed not of family units but of individual women .这里说seamstress guild的成员组成不是家庭成员,而是独立女性.综合起来可得出tailors雇佣的seamstress跟seamstress guild的成员是不同的. 这篇RC算难度很大的了,前后关联点很多,估计考试时这种题比较少. | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2006-5-31 10:11:00
