从12.19起, Liz 回来了, 这次要求很低,作文只要30分! 不要29~ 求亲们狠批~

lizchang1990

12.30 作业，这个文章我超时了10分钟才完成的~~~~
Independent Writing: Some people think that a university professor should focus time on doing research; while others think that the main role of a professor is to educate students in university.
Integrated Writing: TPO 1

Education has been a hot-bottom issue that causes a heat discussion. During the process of pursuing higher education, it is undeniable that professor plays a pivotal role on guiding students toward professional field. Now, here comes a thorny dilemma, should the faculties focus their attention on research? Or should professors emphasize on pure class teaching? Different people from myriad backgrounds will uphold diverse views. From my perspective, the former one overweighs the later one. Several points in different dimensions will be presented and explained to testify my argument.

To begin with, at the top of the list of my viewpoints is that outstanding academic achievements need hands-on experiments in the real working environment, because practical research can endow students these knowledge quickly. To make my standpoint more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. In my first undergraduate study, I participated in a technological works competition. We needed to conduct corresponding research and made polls to investigate the potential problems. At that time, my friend and I cooperated to complete the tasks together. However, I found that although my friend was proficient in the pure academic principle and relevant knowledge, she couldn't apply the knowledge in textbooks into the real problems. Later, I knew that her teacher just imposed the abstract knowledge to them directly without further study. Thanks to my professors' education, I finished my assignment efficiently and kept high quality.

Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that extraordinary research can help professors obtain good reputation and motivate them to contribute to the related academic realm. Hence it will bring a bonus to the whole civilized communities. Generally speaking, some big award like Nobel can catch most scholars' eyes, if someone wins this reward, others will show their respect to them. You know, this kind of acknowledgement will stimulate the self-satisfaction in our inner world. Meanwhile, the excellent teacher who publishes a high-quality paper also will obtain a large number of funds. After the distinguished professor benefit from these, they will do much more studious efforts to study this field.

Last but not least, it is necessary for us to bridge the gap between the assertions before the opposite side has been taken into consideration. Admittedly, single-minded teaching in class can endow students the basic theories and physical principle directly. But the society has changed a lot, we need more practical experience to equip ourselves and keep up with the fast pace of the modern development. If we don’t go outside to do research and professor doesn’t stress this point correspondingly, it is a dire situation for all human beings to imagine.

Given all these carefully analysis I mentioned above, I firmly believe that teachers should spend more time on research rather than on education student in class. Although some people remain query about my illustration, the reasons and explanations I referred will serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the diverse dimensions and reconsider the parts they have ignored. Now, if you are a faculty in a university, which one will you choose between the research and alone teaching? Don't you think the research can bring more interest to both the professor and the whole academic field?


TPO 1,
The listening and the reading uphold totally opposite opinions toward the mandatory policy, which is that companies offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for 80% of their normal pay. The professor illustrates that the new policy cannot benefit for both the individuals and the corporations. Then he raises three points in diverse dimensions to support his standpoints.

To begin with, the speaker contradicts the statement in the reading, which indicates that the shorten workweek will increase the company profits because workers can relax themselves from the new policy and they will make less mistakes in their work. However, the speaker demonstrates that the new policy will force the company spend more expense. Since organization will pay much money to train the employees and pay for their medical benefit. In fact, no matter whether the workers work for five days or four days, cooperation spends the same cost for health fees. In addition, organization also needs to enlarge its space and add more computers for increasing employees. Hence, it is possible to cut the interest rather than increase the profit.

Moreover, the lecturer casts light on the second reason, which suggests that offering this option to employees will reduce unemployment rate. He makes some points by saying that hiring new worker is costly. Furthermore, if people who work four days finish the same tasks as those who work five days, they will feel exhausted, causing damage to their quality of life. Meanwhile, if the work keeps constant, no additional jobs will be provided. On contrary, current job will be unpleasant.

Finally, the instructor disputes the author's viewpoint directly, which claims that employee's life will be improved due to more free time. He explains that there are some risks will decrease our quality of life. Actually, four days schedule will diminish worker's job ability for advanced career. Simultaneously, four-day workers will be the first group to loose their jobs when facing economy down turn, because companies prefer those who work for five days in the position of management to supervise the whole system.

In sum, the presenter carefully discerns the drawbacks of the reading passage and takes one more step to reveal that the fallacies need a close scrutiny.

45573asdasd

黄色是好的
Education has been a hot-bottom issue that causes a heat（heated？） discussion. During the process of pursuing higher education, it is undeniable that professor plays a pivotal role on guiding students toward professional field. Now, here comes a thorny dilemma, should the faculties focus their attention on research? Or should professors emphasize on pure class teaching? Different people from myriad backgrounds will uphold diverse views. From my perspective, the former one overweighs the later one（建议最好说出来，离得有点远。）. Several points in different dimensions will be presented and explained to testify my argument.

To begin with, at the top of the list of my viewpoints is that outstanding academic achievements need hands-on experiments in the real working environment, because practical research can endow students these knowledge quickly. To make my standpoint more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. In my first undergraduate study, I participated in a technological works competition. We needed to conduct corresponding research and made polls to investigate the potential problems. At that time, my friend and I cooperated to complete the tasks together. However, I found that although my friend was proficient in the pure academic principle and relevant knowledge, she couldn't apply the knowledge in textbooks into the real problems. Later, I knew that her teacher just imposed the abstract knowledge to them directly without further study. Thanks to my professors' education, I finished my assignment efficiently and kept high quality.（大神，你这一段的逻辑值得推敲啊，题目不是问你朋友啊，你把全部篇幅都给了你盆友）

Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that extraordinary research can help professors obtain good reputation and motivate them to contribute to the related academic realm. Hence it will bring a bonus to the whole civilized communities. Generally speaking, some big award like Nobel can catch most scholars' eyes, if someone wins this reward, others will show their respect to them. You know, this kind of acknowledgement will stimulate the self-satisfaction in our inner world. Meanwhile, the excellent teacher who publishes a high-quality paper also will obtain a large number of funds. After the distinguished professor benefit from these, they will do much more studious efforts to study this field.

Last but not least, it is necessary for us to bridge the gap between the assertions before the opposite side has been taken into consideration. Admittedly, single-minded teaching in class can endow students the basic theories and physical principle directly. But the society has changed a lot, we need more practical experience to equip ourselves and keep up with the fast pace of the modern development. If we don’t go outside to do research and professor doesn’t stress this point correspondingly, it is a dire situation for all human beings to imagine.

Given all these carefully analysis I mentioned above, I firmly believe that teachers should spend more time on research rather than on education student in class. Although some people remain query about my illustration, the reasons and explanations I referred will serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the diverse dimensions and reconsider the parts they have ignored. Now, if you are a faculty in a university, which one will you choose between the research and alone teaching? Don't you think the research can bring more interest to both the professor and the whole academic field?
我厚着脸皮的来了~希望大神也可以看看我的，后两篇哪篇都行~，都看了我也不介意啊~~哈哈，大神打字真是快，如果能卡住时间就更好了。别到考场出意外了没写够可就亏了~你有些句子确实好，加油

lizchang1990

自我反省,反思,面壁思过~~~最近文笔,逻辑都倒退到一定地步~~~~看来well done is half done啊,以后先想好再着笔了,免得逻辑成了硬伤~

谢谢所有给予指正的同学!!!!

cooperdw

不好意思，视频会议才结束，12点钟之前一定改完！

cooperdw

Education has been a hot-bottom issue that causes a heat discussion. During the process of pursuing higher education, it is undeniable that professor plays a pivotal role on guiding students toward professional field. Now, here comes a thorny dilemma, should the faculties focus their attention on research? Or should professors emphasize on pure class teaching? Different people from myriad backgrounds will uphold diverse views. From my perspective, the former one overweighs the later one. Several points in different dimensions will be presented and explained to testify my argument.

To begin with, at the top of the list of my viewpoints is that outstanding academic achievements need hands-on experiments in the real working environment, because practical research can endow students these knowledge quickly. To make my standpoint more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. In my first undergraduate study, I participated in a technological works competition. We needed to conduct corresponding research and made polls to investigate the potential problems. At that time, my friend and I cooperated (I cooperated with my friend)to complete the tasks together. However, I found that although my friend was proficient in the pure academic principle and relevant knowledge, she couldn't apply the knowledge in textbooks into the real(practical) problems. Later, I knew that her teacher just imposed the abstract knowledge to them directly without further study. Thanks to my professors' education, I finished my assignment efficiently and kept high quality.
(语言表达流畅，值得观摩，单本段第一句话应为本段中心论点，而我反复阅读始终认为你的第一句话和你的所要表达的论点不太搭：为什么教授应该把重心放到研究上？你的论点为牛逼的学术成就需要在工作环境中积极的实践，然后我觉得你本段给出的例子：大概意思是你的同学虽然成绩好，懂得多，但是不能很好的把这些转化为解决问题的手段，然后指出，她的老师教她们的知识太抽象等等；这些是不是有点既偏离了论点，也偏离了题意啊！这些仅是我个人意见，语言表达没的说)



我认为，要论证为什么教授必须要把重心放在研究上，应该从这样几个方面切入：他的贡献大的小；他的研究将会带来什么，改变什么；甚至还可以说学校需要这样的注重研究的教授来打响知名度等等，这些才是切合题意的论点，你觉得呢？




Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that extraordinary research can help professors obtain good reputation and motivate them to contribute to the related academic realm. Hence it will bring a bonus to the whole civilized communities. Generally speaking, some big award like Nobel can catch most scholars' eyes, if someone wins this reward, others will show their respect to them. You know(这种非书面语不好出现在文章中吧As we known会不会更好), this kind of acknowledgement will stimulate the self-satisfaction in our inner world. Meanwhile, the excellent teacher who publishes a high-quality paper also will obtain a large number of funds. After the distinguished professor benefit from these, they will do much more studious efforts to study this field.



（这一段的论据就很好）




Last but not least, it is necessary for us to bridge the gap between the assertions before the opposite side has been taken into consideration. Admittedly, single-minded teaching in class can endow students the basic theories and physical principle directly. But the society has changed a lot, we need more practical experience to equip ourselves and keep up with the fast pace of the modern development. If we don’t go outside to do research and professor doesn’t stress this point correspondingly, it is a dire situation for all human beings to imagine.

Given all these carefully analysis I mentioned above, I firmly believe that teachers should spend more time on research rather than on education student in class（去掉）. Although some people remain query about my illustration, the reasons and explanations I referred will serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the diverse dimensions and reconsider the parts they have ignored. Now, if you are a faculty in a university, which one will you choose between the research and alone teaching? Don't you think the research can bring more interest to both the professor and the whole academic field?

（最后设问结尾，意犹未尽，学习了）



第一段逻辑稍显美中不足，语言表达，词语运用可做典范了







（综合）
The listening and the reading uphold totally opposite opinions toward the mandatory policy, which is that companies offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for 80% of their normal pay. The professor illustrates that the new policy cannot benefit for both the individuals and the corporations. Then he raises three points in diverse dimensions to support his standpoints.

To begin with, the speaker contradicts the statement in the reading, which indicates that the shorten workweek will increase the company profits because workers can relax themselves from the new policy and they will make less mistakes in their work. However, the speaker demonstrates that the new policy will force the company spend more expense. Since organization will pay much money to train the employees and pay for their medical benefit. In fact, no matter whether the workers work for five days or four days, cooperation spends the same cost for health fees. In addition, organization also needs to enlarge its space and add more computers for increasing employees. Hence, it is possible to cut the interest rather than increase the profit.

Moreover, the lecturer casts light on the second reason, which suggests that offering this option to employees will reduce unemployment rate. He makes some points by saying that hiring new worker is costly. Furthermore, if people who work four days to finish the same tasks as those who work five days(if people use four days to finish the workload which they used to finish in five), they will feel exhausted, causing damage to their quality of life. Meanwhile, if the work keeps constant, no additional jobs will be provided. On contrary, current job will be unpleasant.

Finally, the instructor disputes the author's viewpoint directly, which claims that employee's life will be improved due to more free time. He explains that there are some risks will decrease our quality of life. Actually, four days schedule will diminish worker's job ability for advanced career. Simultaneously, four-day workers will be the first group to loose their jobs when facing economy down turn, because companies prefer those who work for five days in the position of management to supervise the whole system.

In sum, the presenter carefully discerns the drawbacks of the reading passage and takes one more step to reveal that the fallacies need a close scrutiny.

表达有很多东西值得学习，继续保持

lizchang1990

12.31独立作业                           TV  VS  Books

As a saying goes, knowledge is power. It also is an undeniable fact that, from time to time, a variety of people have been pursuing good education. Now, there comes a thorny issue towards which is better for people to acquire more hands-on knowledge and obtain up-to-date information. Different individuals from myriad backgrounds uphold divided views on this topic. Does television outweighs the paper books? From my perspective, the former one plays a more pivotal role on the way of receiving knowledge. Several points will be presented and explained to testify my standpoint.

To begin with, the top of the list of my arguments is that television can provide more intriguing programs, so it will attract more people to study with high passion. All of these are vital elements for people to absorb useful information and broaden their horizons. As we know, television is the combination of vivid images and sound, the advanced technology can catch our eyes quickly and foster people's interest on academic knowledge, simultaneously boosting us to get rid of the annoying situation, namely we don't need to force ourselves to turn the pages again and again. What’s more, since interest is the best teacher, when we cultivate the interest on some professional field, we can acquire more constructive knowledge easily.

Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that long-distance learning on television can help us receive the distinguished teaching from other excellent scholars quickly. To make my perspective more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. Once I was struggling to look for relevant materials about psychological recognition. Later, one of my friends suggested that I could attend a long-distance class on television, and the teacher who taught that chapter came from Stanford University. To enrich my related theoretical knowledge, I took that long-distance course for 2 months. Eventually, I got a comprehensive understanding on that realm and also broadened my outlooks during this process. Thanks to the curricular on the television, I could handle my puzzle efficiently.

Last but not least, it is necessary to close the gap between the assertions, television and books, when facing such an intractable dilemma, before the opposite side has been taken into consideration. Admittedly, the information in books has been tested for a long time by many scholars, but the modern society has changed so much. We need more promptly knowledge to feed our hungry minds in a short time. Otherwise we will fall behind other counterparts. Actually, it is a common sense that printing will cost a long time, no doubt that the process will impede us to acquire the useful knowledge. However, television can solve the problem at some extent due to advanced information technology.

Given all these carefully analyses, I firmly believe that people can learn more from television than from books. Although some individuals remain query about my viewpoints, the reasons and explanations I referred will undoubtedly serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the various dimensions and reconsider the parts they have ignored. Now, if you have a chance to choose a way for study, will not you choose television?

lizchang1990

TPO 2  这篇综合很诡异,写得很纠结,文本对应点与教授说得不知道错开好远,辛苦我写得这么揪心哇~~~

The listening and the reading uphold totally opposite opinions toward whether team is a good way to approach some certain projects. The professor illustrates that an integrated team has many problems and disadvantages. Then he raises three perspectives to demonstrate his standpoint.

To begin with, the speaker contradicts the statement in the passage, which indicates that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge and make decisions quickly. He asserts that in a group, some employees will be free rider and do less contribution to the team. What’s more, a group needs to take many many meetings to reach an agreement. This is a time-consuming process. Obviously, this approach cannot boost the job to be finished quickly.

In addition, the lecturer casts light on the second reason in the article, which suggests that team members who have a voice in making a decision will feel better. He explains that, on the contrary, if the group does a good job, they will share the benefits together. Of course, for those studious members, their recognition will down under such an integrated situation. Since the company reward the team as a whole not to a certain person. In this case, when we ask those who contribute a lot, ''what's your feelings?'' Their attitudes are completely opposite to the assertion in the passage. Actually, the hard-working employees don't feel good.

Finally, the instructor disputes the author's argument directly, which advocates that the single member has a chance to "shine", to get his or her contribution and idea recognized as highly significant, by saying that if some influencers in a team don't agree with some idea, then the thought will drop quickly without a further discussion. However, if the influencers think some ideas are creative, they will convince others to go ahead. Albeit some members will warn the suggestion, they just ignore the concerns. As a result, once the project fails, all members will be blamed. Now, we can see it is a disastrous situation for part of individuals in a group.

In sum, the presenter carefully discerns the drawbacks of the reading passage and takes one more step to reveal that the fallacies need a close scrutiny.

shanhunian

12月31日 改独立

As a saying goes, knowledge is power. It also 放在is后面吧， is also)is an undeniable fact that, from time to time, a variety of people have been pursuing good education. Now, there comes a thorny issue towards which is better for people to acquire more hands-on knowledge and obtain up-to-date information. Different individuals from myriad backgrounds uphold divided views on this topic. Does television outweighs the paper books? From my perspective, the former one plays a more pivotal role on the way of (感觉用to 会不会好点）receiving knowledge. Several points will be presented and explained to testify my standpoint.

To begin with, the top of the list of my arguments is that television can provide more intriguing programs, so it will attract more people to study with high passion. All of these are vital elements for people to absorb useful information and broaden their horizons. As we know, television is the combination of vivid images and sound, （加s吧，sounds）the advanced technology can catch our eyes quickly and foster people's interest on academic knowledge, simultaneously boosting us to get rid of the annoying situation, namely （namely是举例的意思吧，）we don't need to force ourselves to turn the pages again and again. What’s more, since interest is the best teacher, when we cultivate the interest on some professional field, we can acquire more constructive knowledge easily. （一般结论的时候，还是要结合开头的那个主题句吧。我不知道这样是不是有点冒险，让人家误会你的结论和这段的主题句无关，这段的主题是吸引更多more的人学习，但你的最后结论是easily, 虽然中间也有阐述，但是会不会有点冒险呢，万一考官没仔细看的话）

Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that long-distance learning on television can help us receive the distinguished teaching from other excellent scholars quickly. To make my perspective more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. Once I was struggling to look for relevant materials about psychological recognition（once引导从句，后面还要来一个什么主句接上吧，不然就感觉是半那个句子没说完）. Later, one of my friends suggested that I could attend a long-distance class on television, and the teacher who taught that chapter came from Stanford University. To enrich my related theoretical knowledge, I took that long-distance course for 2 months. Eventually, I got a comprehensive understanding on that realm and also broadened my outlooks during this process. Thanks to the curricular on the television, I could handle my puzzle efficiently.（这段的主题是通过电视接受到特别的教育quickly，你的结论是可以高效的解决你的puzzle，有那么点牵强。。感觉）， 我觉得可以换个句式表达重申下你这段的主题，会更保险一点，在考试的时候）

Last but not least, it is necessary to close the gap between the assertions, television and books, when facing such an intractable dilemma, before the opposite side has been taken into consideration.（感觉这句话表达的不是很顺畅。。。句子结构读不懂，it is necessary to ...when ....before...?） Admittedly, the information in books has been tested for a long time by many scholars, but the modern society has changed so much. We need more promptly knowledge to feed our hungry(这个词用的很好，哈哈） minds in a short time. Otherwise we will fall behind other counterparts. Actually, it is a common sense that printing will cost a long time, no doubt that the process will impede us to acquire the useful knowledge. However, television can solve the problem at some extent due to advanced information technology.

Given all these carefully analyses, I firmly believe that people can learn more from television than from books. Although some individuals remain query about my viewpoints, the reasons and explanations I referred will undoubtedly serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the various dimensions and reconsider the parts they have ignored. Now, if you have a chance to choose a way for study, will not you choose television? （疑问句结尾，很不错哦）
1，这次比较明显的问题感觉是，段的主题句和最后该段的结论有点牵强。我自己感觉是，为了保险起见，不偏题，和节省时间，每段的主题和结论最好是一样的，但是可以换个句式表达，这算不算一个小小的技巧呢，嘿嘿。。）这样就使得文章逻辑性更加严密了吧。。嘿嘿。。
2，你的用词，句式，总是那么好，嘿嘿，大大的加分呀。。保持。。。）
ps：我现在用的电脑网速非常不给力，所以不能用颜色标注，只能用一个颜色，抱歉呀。。）

shanhunian

The listening and the reading uphold totally opposite opinions toward whether team is a good way to approach some certain projects. The professor illustrates that an integrated team has many problems and disadvantages. Then he raises three perspectives to demonstrate his standpoint.

To begin with, the speaker contradicts the statement in the passage, which indicates that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge and make decisions quickly. He asserts that in a group, some employees will be free rider and do less contribution to the team. （and连接的2个短句不平行，感觉，be free rider 和do less，）What’s more, a group needs to take many many meetings to reach an agreement. This is a time-consuming process. Obviously, this approach cannot boost the job to be finished quickly.

In addition, the lecturer（我看到的经验总结有人说，阅读和听力的称谓是不要变化的，要变化的是，那些比如反对呀，同意呀，阐述啊，这些词，最好全文都用一个统一的称谓，如都用speaker, author, 等。这样使得考官看起来也好点，换词要用在需要的地方，嘿嘿。。。但不是每个地方都要换词。。）我自己也有同感，感觉统一称谓会好些...casts light on the second reason in the article, which suggests that team members who have a voice in making a decision will feel better. He explains that, on the contrary, if the group does a good job, they will share the benefits together. Of course, for those studious members, their recognition will down under such an integrated situation. Since the company reward the team as a whole not to a certain person. In this case, when we ask those who contribute a lot, ''what's your feelings?'' Their attitudes are completely opposite to the assertion in the passage. Actually, the hard-working employees don't feel good.（这好像是你自己加的观点哦。带有个人观点色彩的成分。。。听力中没直接说not good，好像是你的推断吧，毕竟人家没直说，这个最好还是不这样表述吧。。）

Finally, the instructor disputes the author's argument directly, which advocates that the single member has a chance to "shine", to get his or her contribution and idea recognized as highly significant, by saying that if some influencers in a team don't agree with some idea, then the thought will drop quickly without a further discussion. However, if the influencers think some ideas are creative, they will convince others to go ahead. Albeit some members will warn the suggestion, they just ignore the concerns. As a result, once the project fails, all members will be blamed. Now, we can see it is a disastrous situation for part of individuals in a group.

In sum, the presenter carefully discerns the drawbacks of the reading passage and takes one more step to reveal that the fallacies need a close scrutiny.

你的问题，我也有，但我更严重哦，就是说，阅读中的3个点，和听力中的3个点，感觉有些难对应。我也是最近才发现的问题。就是说，考试的时候，一般阅读3段和听力中的3段的每个点都是对应的，但是，一定要自己对每段的主要观点进行提取。不能把细节当做该段的观点来对应，不然逻辑就会容易出错。如果自己感觉很难对应上3个点，那么这个时候就说明自己对文章的3个点没有准确的把握。
所以，考试的时候，最重要的是对3个点的准确对应和把握，阅读和听力中的细节不能理解当做该段的主题句，否则逻辑就错了。。。这个问题，应该是综合作文最重要的吧，平常我们看的是寂静，都是看中文的，而且都是提取出了主题句的，所以发现不了这个问题。但是万一遇到不是寂静的题目，这个问题就出现了。。。(好好加强，共勉。。）
2，文中说了，阅读和听力的称谓最好是一致的，这个不需要换词哦。。。嘿嘿。。）

lizchang1990

January
Independent Writing:Agree or disagree? Patient is usually not a good thing, we should take actions at once.
Integrated Writing: TPO 3

Patience is a virtue that a myriad of people have been appreciated from time to time. However, in such a society with speedy development, is this belief still a useful benchmark for modern generations? This thorny issue has raised hotly discussion. Different persons from diverse backgrounds will uphold different opinions toward the intractable topic. From my perspective, we should take actions at once rather than be patient now. Several points in various dimensions will be presented and explained to testify my standpoint.

To begin with, the top of my list of viewpoints is that taking action can benefit single individual from both the academic aspect and interpersonal relationship. To make my view more convincing, I would like to take my own experience as an example. I am an active girl in my class and always answer the professor’s questions quickly. Of course, sometimes I also give the wrong answers. But professors often encourage me to raise my hands frequently, because I can interact with teachers and learn much more from their lectures. So the process of self-improvement helps me get high scores in many subjects. What’ more, when I answer the questions right, other students who are still confused about some certain chapters, they will ask me to explain. As a result, friendship is been enhanced. On the contrary, if I keep patient and silent to wait for a perfect answer, maybe the result will be totally opposite.

Moreover, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that taking actions in addressing environment crisis is necessary and indispensible without a tardy excuse. As we know, our surroundings have been polluted since the Industrial Revolution. A lot of dire problems we have to face now, such as the global warming, carbon dioxide emission, ozone holes, poisonous pesticide, the list will keep go on. These series of risks should be given high attention, and our government should take timely actions to handle these risks. Otherwise, it will be disaster for al human beings in the world.

Last but not least, it is necessary for us to close the gap between the assertions, before the opposite side has been taken into consideration. Admittedly, being patient can leave us a lot of time to consider things profoundly, and we can get a more comprehensive idea for an issue. However, the era has changed so much. For example, in the business realm, if we remain patience, we will loose the prior chance to tap into a new market. This rule has been proved in Sumsung Company. Every year, Sumsung will produce a variety of different types of smart cellphone. It is the creative functions in the new phone that attract a great many people to buy the products. While, other companies just produce the outdated types and wait for consumers’ new taste instead of creating the new market by themselves. You can guess, Sumsung can obtain the advantages easily due to prepared actions. Hence, we can see it is an inevitable element for us to take actions quickly in the fierce business field.

Given all these carefully analyses, I firmly believe that taking actions can bring us huge bonus. Although some people still remain query about my illustration, the reasons and explanations I referred above will propel the opponents to notice the parts they have ignored. Now, if you have a chance to choose between patience and taking actions, in order to achieve success easily, will not you choose taking promptly actions?