10月6日狗

nancy716

悲催啊！！！二战遇换库，估计我这回人品攒够了...........
AWA:a newsletter for shareholders of Blosterm Corporation:
Because of a worldwide drop in demand in mining technology last year, Blosterm corporation, a mining technology corporatoin, should switch to renewable technology. the renewable is a boom in the industry and the renewable technology companies have been successful, thus we can gurentee shareholders that Blosterm corporation will be successful in the future.
Maths: 2.3.4.5.7这五个数排列，有多少种排列是偶数
其他的容我再想想
Verbal：阅读：insurance company
p1：insurance companies may be vulnerable 如果发生自然灾害的话，某某机构搞了个啥bonds（c字头的bondsman）这样insurance companies就不会损失太惨
p2:举了一个bonds应用于hurricane的例子
问了主旨题和第二段的作用
啊！！！！剩下的我真的不记得了！！！
语法：110.    
It has been estimated that the annual cost to the United States of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year.
(A) the annual cost to the United States of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year
(B) the annual cost of illiteracy to the United States is at least $20 billion a year because of lost industrial output and tax revenues
(C) illiteracy costs the United States at least $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues
(D) $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues is the annual cost to the United States of illiteracy
(E) lost industrial output and tax revenues cost the United States at least $20 billion a year because of illiteracy
In choices A, B, and D, the combined use of annual and a year is redundant. Choices A, D, and E are awkward and confused because other constructions intrude within the phrase cost... of illiteracy: for greatest clarity, cost should be followed immediately by a phrase (e.g., of illiteracy ) that identifies the nature of the cost. Choice E is particularly garbled in reversing cause and effect, saying that it is lost output and revenues rather than illiteracy that costs the United States over $20 billion a year. Choice B is wordy and awkward, and idiom requires in rather than because of to introduce a phrase identifying the constituents of the $20 billion loss. Concise, logically worded, and idiomatic, choice C is best.
妥妥的原题，就碰上这么一道
逻辑有一个题干和啥药的很相似但是问的完全是不一样的东西

唉，搞成这个样子真是无语了，希望我三战一定700+
真心谢谢这个月整理机经的同学们，虽然换库了，但是整理的太好了，我爱你们！！！
祝愿接下来考的同学们拿到满意的分数：）

姐要去睡大头觉了，GMAT你给姐等着！！！！我烤死你丫的！！！

arleneyau

谢谢楼主！！！！！下次RP爆棚~！！！！！！！！！！！

sparklelynn

LZ还能想出其他阅读篇目么、？？？

nancy716

啊！！！IR：有三个药，应该是三个药，每个药有两种效果吧，完了有个折线图，横坐标是时间，每个药有两个折线，问哪种药的两个效果相关性最差，在第几天标准差最小，应该是第七天如果我没记错的话

nancy716

LZ还能想出其他阅读篇目么、？？？

-- by 会员 sparklelynn (2012/12/6 22:25:31)

啊！！小美女我做到后来全乱了，别的记不得了，不过等有其他JJ我去确认一下，谢谢你的阅读JJ哦~~~~~

sparklelynn

好的谢谢LZ明天可能就会出JJ 记得来看哦

nancy716

数学DS：原谅我的片段式渣记忆
有俩数x y,r和s分别是这俩数的十位数，问x>y?
1) r>s
2) x<100, Y<100

nancy716

好的谢谢LZ明天可能就会出JJ 记得来看哦

-- by 会员 sparklelynn (2012/12/6 22:31:24)

好的~：）

czw19921119

楼主楼主，帮忙确认一下，那篇Insurance的阅读是跟这篇有关吗？

现在的这种发展方式破坏环境，不利于可持续发展，且pit the interest rate against future …。因此建议政府筹资，对the future generation 发行bond。这样就可以不削减人们的消费水平，而且可以筹到资保护环境，减小未来治理global warming花费更多资金的可能。

因为当当上个月的逻辑背得太熟了，打打酱油，帮一下辛苦的雪菲姐姐~~

nancy716

楼主楼主，帮忙确认一下，那篇Insurance的阅读是跟这篇有关吗？

现在的这种发展方式破坏环境，不利于可持续发展，且pit the interest rate against future …。因此建议政府筹资，对the future generation 发行bond。这样就可以不削减人们的消费水平，而且可以筹到资保护环境，减小未来治理global warming花费更多资金的可能。

因为当当上个月的逻辑背得太熟了，打打酱油，帮一下辛苦的雪菲姐姐~~

-- by 会员 czw19921119 (2012/12/6 22:41:26)

不是耶，我刚才看另一个童鞋有写的比我更详细的 ~