lmylacoste的作文贴，求狠该,今天机经写作一起开始！

lmylacoste

10.31
Young people nowadays have no influence on decisions that determine the future of the society as a whole. A\D


   There is perhaps no issue is more significant to the whole country than the one about how large voice children have on the determination of the future of the society. Although the individual's taste does differ, the view ruling the roost in my mind is that young generation is the main force in the development of the country.
   First of all, the top of the list of my viewpoints is that the popular culture is intrinsically ties with the young generation's flavor, since the children are better at express their points than before. From common sense and the experience from our daily life, youngsters are able to influence the trend of the culture and even create the new types. My own experience is a good case in point. When I was in senior high school, I was surprised by some phenomenon that the posters and the records of cartoons was everywhere, and at the same time, most books in bookstores and information on the Internet are on the related topics. To make my demonstration, I'd like to refer to a kind of characters named Mars Characters, fully displaying the original and imginary imaginary of the young people, from which my point can draw strength. The characters are some kinds of abbrevation abbreviation of the normal ones, especially used to efficient communication on the Internet. And more and more elder generation start to utilize them to save time.
   In addition, another equally essential point is that the views are more easily heard by the elder people through the development the information technology, as the example of my experience aptly illustrates. I remembered that once I have written an email to the mayor of my city to propose that the environment near my senior was so crowded and dirty and some controls were needed. Just the next day, I received the return e-mail by the mayor on which he said he would pay attention to the social problem and praised me to give such a good suggestion. From the part-and parcel of our daily life, this kinds of replies may lead those people being told for so long by so many, who are cynical, fearful and doubtful, to put their hands on the arc of the society toward the young people part.
   Admittedly, it is necessary to cut short the relentless pace to the conclusion, before the opposition has been taken into consideration. Human natural being what it is, people are not inclined to believe the young people in afraid that they are inexperience and further limit their innate rights to decide the direction of the proceeding of the society. There is no better illustration than this example. Compared with the Western countries in which some mayors are just university students, our government leaders are mainly composed of elders which leads to the country being conservative and inactive. Maybe it is reasonable under some conditions to refer the elders’ experience, but this case is occasional and negligible enough to constitute a sufficient support for the adverse side because it is measure of compulsory and will not exert a positive influence on the whole country. After weighing the advantages and the weakness, the upshot is obvious that the young generation has great impact on the proceeding and should be free from the unreasonable restrictions.
   In conclusion, maybe someone still remain unconvinced, the factors and reasons may at least serve the purpose to propel the opponents to be aware of the fact about the culture influenced by them, technology which may enhance their impacts and some cases seemingly supporting the opposite view but concealed by the limitations. And I hope more and more people may share the same opinion with me.

综合

The reading casts light on the factors causing the decline of population of birds. The professor's lecture covers the same topic, yet with the totally different attitude. Likewise, the professor utilizes three distinctive reasons to justify his perspective.

First of all, the professor refutes the idea in the reading passage that the increasing population and settlements will further lead to the natural habitats disappear. On the contrary, she asserts that the expansion of the population and settlements will be reduce the birds' habitat but will increase more space for birds to live. To be specific, her claim is grounded on the fact that some suburban places like street will accommodate the pigeons.And some population of birds may shrink while other may increase. Apparently, the professor's ideas are incompatible with the reading passage.

In addition, as-well-defined as the reading passage is, the professor's statement once again contradicts with the points made in the passage. She contends that since a kind of more productive crops has been introduced so that there is no need to convert the natural habitats of birds for agricultural use. Evidently having taken this reason into consideration, the professor has sounded doubts on the reading passage.

What's more, the reading passage pinpoints that the increase use of chemical pesticides will lead to the decline of birds. However, the professor challenges the point by arguing that people have already been aware of the danger caused by traditional pesticides. The professor defends her perspective further through showing that new and much less toxic pesticides have been developed and people begin to grow the pest-resistant crops which not only can reduce the use of chemical pesticides but also is not harmful to the birds.

The professor clearly discerns the drawbacks in the reading passage and with one more step to reveal that this fallacious needs a closer scrutiny.

lmylacoste

 王京竹 11月份 综+独

   There is perhaps no issue more significant to students than that about the job preparation. A myriad of responses people may hold on the topic concerning the issue. Although the individual's taste does differ, the view ruling the roost in my mind is that job preparation should be prepared before students enter their positions.

First of all, the top of the list of my viewpoints is that the job preparation project is intrinsically tied with the success of students' careers. From common sense and the experience from our daily lives, the preparation may give a students a chance to know thoroughly about the society which is far away and unfamiliar to them and teach them basic wisdom about how to communication with co-workers. To make my demonstration more comprehensively, I'd like to refer to a story of my brother from which my point can draw strength. Benefited by the job preparation, my brother has mastered an excellent skill of communication and can keep close relationship with his supervisor and he obtains more opportunities than others.

In addition, another compelling point worth being mentioned is that such preparation will improve the professional skills for different students so that they will be more easily to earn a ideal job, as my own experience aptly illustrates. My major is mathematics but I was pursuing a job in financial fields in which my experience is so insufficient that it would be difficult for me to be admitted. Thanks to the preparation, not only did I learn a lot about the general skills in society, but, more importantly, the professor introduced me the crucial knowledge which linked the two seemingly unrelated fields and gave me a hand to grasp the job. From part-and parcel of our daily life, this reply may lead those who are told for so long by so many, who are cynical, fearful and doubtful, to put their hands on the arc of trust toward the job preparation.

Admittedly, it is necessary to cut short the relentless pace toward assertion unless the opposition has been taken into consideration. There is no better illustration than this way to demonstrate this point. Some of my friends has taken such job preparation, but they don't think it’s essential but meaningless. It is vital for students to be aware of those cases that some preparations are not beneficial to them because of the outdated information and some uncommiteduncommitted professors. But these cases are occasional and negligible enough to constitute a sufficient support for the opposite side. After carefully weighing the advantages and weaknesses of job preparation, the striking upshot is that it is indispensible for every job hunter.

In sum, although some people may remain unconvinced, the reasons and factors I have analyzed that the job preparations can enhance the ability of communication and complement the necessary knowledge and most of them will bring about benefits will propel the opponents to consider the various dimensions of the issue and I hope more and more people will share the same idea with me.

The reading material casts light on the reasons of the formation of the MIMA mound. The professor’s lecture covers the same topic, yet with the totally opposite attitude. Likewise, the professor utilizes three distinctive reasons to illustrate her perspective.

First of all, the professor refutes the idea in the reading passage that the MIMA mound was built by Native Americans since there are records to manifest that they had built similar structures before. On the contrary, she asserts that the MIMA mound was not built by native dwellers. To be specific, she's claim is grounded on the fact that there is not any relics left by humans at those sites. Apparently, the professor's attitude is incompatible with the reading passage.

In addition, as well-defined as the reading passage is, the professor's statement once again contradicts with the point made in the reading which attempts to explain the MIMA mound by earthquakes by the reason of the loose soil nearby. She contends that even in places where there has not been any quakes, mounds exist still. Clearly having taken this reason into consideration, the professor has sounded doubts on the reading passage.

What's more, the reading passage pinpoints that the construction was created by bun-owing of a type of rodents. But the professor challenges that point by arguing that there has been no record of observation of such rodents there. Evidently, the argument has some problems if this fact has been taken into account.

In sum, the professor not only discerns the drawbacks of the reading passage, but also takes one more step to reveals that the fallacious argument needs a closer scrutiny.

小滋滋

等11.2综合

我把托福踩脚下

综合

The reading casts light on the factors causing the decline of population of birds. The professor's lecture covers the same topic, yet with the totally different attitude. Likewise, the professor utilizes three distinctive reasons to justify his perspective.

First of all, the professor refutes the idea in the reading passage that the increasing population and settlements will further lead to the natural habitats disappear. On the contrary, she asserts that the expansion of the population and settlements will be reduce （不该用被动）the birds' habitat but will increase more space for birds to live. To be specific, her claim is grounded on the fact that some suburban places like street will accommodate the pigeons.And some population of birds may shrink while other may increase. Apparently, the professor's ideas are incompatible with the reading passage.

In addition, as-well-defined as the reading passage is, the professor's statement once again contradicts with the points made in the passage. She contends that since a kind of more productive crops has been introduced so that there is no need to convert the natural habitats of birds for agricultural use. Evidently having taken this reason into consideration, the professor has sounded doubts on the reading passage.

What's more, the reading passage pinpoints that the increase use of chemical pesticides will lead to the decline of birds. However, the professor challenges the point by arguing that people have already been aware of the danger caused by traditional pesticides. The professor defends her perspective further through showing that new and much less toxic pesticides have been developed and people begin to grow the pest-resistant crops which not only can reduce the use of chemical pesticides but also is not harmful to the birds.

The professor clearly discerns the drawbacks in the reading passage and with one more step to reveal that this fallacious needs a closer scrutiny.

不错不错， 有好多好词汇。

lmylacoste

There is perhaps no issue more significant than this one whether people should purchase the domestic made commodities even though affording the high cost. A myriad of responses people may hold on the topic concerning the issue. Although the individual's taste does differ, a view ruling the roost in my mind is that buying the domestic products should be the primary consideration no matter how high the price is.
To begin with, the development of a country is intrinsically tied with its economic condition, determined by the sales of its products. From the common sense and the experience from our daily life, the more products are brought by people, the better the manufacture industry will be. Besides, the higher price is a signal of the high quality to some extents. And the extra profit will improve the economy of the whole country. To make my demonstration more comprehensively, I'd like to refer to a example of KoeraKorea. Most electronic devices like cell phones and television used by KoeraKorea are Samsung which provides the company a lot of profit to grow and become the pillarcompany to support the economy of KoeraKorea. This example illustrates that if more people would like to pay for the domestic products, the economy will be reinforced.
In addition, another equally essential point is that buying things made in our own country will shows your patriotic spirit. And the patriotic spirit is the prerequsiteprerequisite of the prosperous country as Japan aptly demonstrates. Japanese are loving their own country so that they are loyal to their domestic products since they have the confidence in the quality of commodities and buying the products is a good way to illustrate their patriotic spirit. Not only does Japan illustrates the point, but German is also such kind of a country whose eminent car industry are encouraged by its civil people. From the partand parcel of our daily life, these replies given by Japanese may lead to those who have been told for so long by so many, who are cynical, fearful and doubtful to put their hands on the arc of their expenditure toward the domestic products.
Admittedly, it is necessary to cut short the relentless pace to the assertion without the opposition has been taken into consideration. There is no better illustration than this one to reveal the problems of the issue. Recently, there is some kind of toxic chemical substance are found in the milk powder made by a big company funded by the country which have a extremely bad influence on the health of babies. And before that, several babies have had serious illness because of the powder. This kind of problems, like the unsafety, is necessary for people to be aware of. But such kind of thing is occasional and it is insufficient to verify the opposite view since other domestic products are free from these problems. What we need to do is not to stop buying the domestic products but to require related departments to intensify the quality supervising and control.
In conclusion, although someone may still remain unconvinced, the factors and reasons I have analyzed including the impetus of economy and the display of the patriotic spirit and not being too doubtful to suspend buying domestic products will propel those opponents to notice the various dimension of the issue. And I hope more and more people will share the same idea with me.

The reading passage casts light on three solutions to deal with the decline of Torreya, a kind of trees in danger. The professor's lecture covers the same topic, yet with the totally opposite attitude. Likewise, the professor utilizes three distinctive reasons to justify her perspective.

To begin with, the professor refutes the idea in the reading that Yorreya will be reestablished in the same location because of the suitable microclimate. On the contrary, the professor asserts that this method will not work. To be specific, her claim is grounded on the fact that the coolest and dampest areas and the microclimate will not last for a long time since the warming trend is spreading and the wetlands will be drained and get increasingly dry. Therefore, the ideal microclimate condition will be nowhere. Apparently, the professor's point is incompatible with the reading material.

In addition, as well-defined as the reading passage is, the professor's statement once again contradicts with the points made in the reading. She contends that there is another kind tree having been moved to further north which kill a lot of native plants also in dangers and cause great damage to the original environment. Evidently having taken those reasons into consideration, the professor has sounded doubts on the reading passage.

What's more, the reading passage pinpoints that preserving Torreya in research centers may be a good way to protect them from extinction. However, the professor challenges the point by arguing that Torreya will not survive better since the research center has not enough capacity for accommodating diverse and sheer number of trees, which is the key point for them to cope with the dieases for long-term. After these facts have been taken into account, the passage is obviously flawed.

In sum, the professor clearly disernsdiscerns the drawback in the passage and one more step reveals that the fallacious passage needs a closer scrutiny.

bonnenuit

There is perhaps no issue more significant than this one whether people should purchase the domestic made commodities even though affording the high cost. A myriad of responses people may hold on the topic concerning the issue. Although the individual's taste does differ, a view ruling the roost in my mind is that buying the domestic products should be the primary consideration no matter how high the price is.

To begin with, the development of a country is intrinsically tied with its economic condition, and determined by the sales of its products. From the common sense and the experience from our daily life, the more products are brought by people(被动是可以的，从后面半句是主动语态，我觉得这句主动更好些，换people purchase）, the better the manufacture industry will be. Besides, the higher price is a signal of the high quality to some extents. And the extra profit will improve the economy of the whole country. To make my demonstration more comprehensively, I'd like to refer to a example of KoeraKorea. Most electronic devices like cell phones and television used by KoeraKorea are Samsung which(从G的语法看 which不能指代全面一整句话，换that） provides the company a lot of profit to grow and become the pillarcompany to support the economy of KoeraKorea. This example illustrates that if more people would like to pay for the domestic products, the economy will be reinforced.

In addition, another equally essential point is that buying things made in our own country will shows your patriotic spirit. And the patriotic spirit is the prerequsiteprerequisite of the prosperous country as Japan aptly demonstrates. Japanese are loving their own country so that they are loyal to their domestic products since they have the confidence in the quality of commodities and buying the products is a good way to illustrate their（这个their最近的是products，因而指代就错误了，可以改写成illustrate their。。。by/through buying )patriotic spirit. Not only does Japan illustrates the point, but German is also such kind of a country whose eminent car（automobile） industry are(is） encouraged by its civil people. From the partand parcel of our daily life, these replies given by Japanese may lead to those who have been told for so long by so many, who are cynical, fearful and doubtful to put their hands on the arc of their expenditure toward the domestic products.

Admittedly, it is necessary to cut short the relentless pace to the assertion without the opposition has been taken into consideration. There is no better illustration than this one to reveal the problems of the issue. Recently, there is（are) some kinds of toxic chemical substances are found in the milk powder made by a big company funded by the country which have a extremely bad influence on the health of babies. And before that, several babies have had serious illness because of the powder. This kind of problems, like the unsafety, is necessary for people to be aware of. But such kind of thing is occasional and it is insufficient to verify the opposite view since other domestic products are free from these problems. What we need to do is not to stop buying the domestic products but to require related departments to intensify the quality supervising and control.

In conclusion, although someone may still remain unconvinced, the factors and reasons I have analyzed including the impetus of economy and the display of the patriotic spirit and not being too doubtful to suspend buying domestic products will propel those opponents to notice the various dimension of the issue. And I hope more and more people will share the same idea with me.

小滋滋

11.2改

小滋滋

The reading passage casts light on three solutions to deal with the decline of Torreya, a kind of trees in danger. The professor's lecture covers the same topic, yet with the totally opposite attitude. Likewise,（个人认为不太好） the professor utilizes three distinctive reasons to justify her perspective.

To begin with, the professor refutes the idea in the reading that Yorreya will be reestablished in the same location because of the suitable microclimate. On the contrary, the professor asserts that this method will not work. To be specific, her claim is grounded on the fact that the coolest and dampest areas and the microclimate will not last for a long time since the warming trend is spreading and the wetlands will be drained and get increasingly dry. Therefore, the ideal microclimate condition will be nowhere. Apparently, the professor's point is incompatible with the reading material.

In addition, as well-defined as the reading passage is, the professor's statement once again contradicts with the points made in the reading.(没看懂，是什么和什么在比呢？) She contends that there is another kind treehaving been moved to further north which kill a lot of native plants also in dangers and cause great damage to the original environment. Evidently having taken those reasons into consideration, the professor has sounded doubts on the reading passage.

What's more, the reading passage pinpoints that preserving Torreya in research centers may be a good way to protect(prevent) them from extinction. However, the professor challenges the point by arguing that Torreya will not survivebetter since the research center has not enough capacity for accommodating diverse and sheer number of trees, which is the key point for them to cope with the diseases for long-term. After these facts have been taken into account, the passage is obviously flawed.

In sum, the professor clearly disernsdiscerns the drawback in the passage and one more step reveals that the fallacious passage needs a closer scrutiny.

观点对比明确，但觉着有些句子写的有点罗嗦，语言在简练点哈@@

lmylacoste

There is perhaps no issue more controversial to people than this one about whether or not people are much happier with possessions. A myriad of responses people may hold on the topic with reference to the issue regarding the degree of happiness influenced by wealth. Although the individual's taste does differ, the view ruling the roost on my mind is that possession is the primary consideration in happiness.
First of all, the top of list of my viewpoints is that fortunes are intrinsically tied with happiness because people can afford a comfortable life with advanced facilities. From common sense and the experience from our daily life, we can buy a lot of products to improve our living conditions. To make my demonstration more comprehensively, I'd like to refer to the experience of my best two friends from which my point may draw strength. The first guy, born in a rich family, possesses countless digital devices like ipad through which he can play games and listen to music everywhere and receive e-mail at any time. Compared with him, the second person cannot afford such equipments and have no chance to experience the happiness brought by the developed technology. From this case, the importance of possession has emerged.
In addition, another equally compelling point is that money will allow us to travel to appreciate the amazing landscapes and cultural remains, as my own experience aptly illustrates. Thanks to the possessions, I can travel a lot of places like England and America. When I was a exchange student in England, not only did I learn the local customs, but also the scenic spots including The Stonehenge left me deep impression about the intelligence of ancestors and the brilliant history about the England. Not only does this case verify my point, another case coming from my parents also illustrates it. My parents are not good at spoken English, but after two-month travel in Europe, they can speak like natives. From part-and-parcel of our daily life, these replies may lead those people having been told for so long by so many, who are cynical, fearful and doubtful, to put their hands on the arc of their favor toward possessions.
What's more, fortunes can also bring us knowledge. As we all know, the tuition in the universities has been increased because of the recession of economy. So without enough money, it is difficult for students to receive good education and even impossible to have chance to enter the Lvy League.
Admittedly, it is necessary to cut short the relentless paces to the assertion before the opposition has been taken into consideration. Human nature being what it is, people will be absorbed in some sorts of pernicious activities because of fortune, such as gambling and fighting for legacy. But people should not blame for fortune because of this kind of cases since it's not the fault of fortune but the fault of people who cannot address money with a right attitude. For example, the extra money can be donated to help the need and cement their own business. These sorts of things are occasional and negligible enough to constitute a sufficient support for the adverse view. After carefully weighing the advantages and the weaknesses, the striking upshot is obvious that possessions are beneficial and crucial to our happiness.
In sum, although there are still someone who remain unconvinced, the reasons and factors I have analyzed that fortunes allow us to have advanced facilities to equip our lives, travels to enrich our experience and enlarge our horizons and knowledge to instruct us will at least serve the purpose to propel the opponents to notice the various dimensions of the issue and I hope more and more people will share the same idea with me.

婷婷connie

11.5的独立快写哦~