请教一道逻辑题！对此题一点思路都没有

hankunlun

1.     Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.

A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?

(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.

(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.

(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.

(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.

(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.

只是想这是一道推断题，可看不出选项和文章有什么联系

cranberry

这个是一道逻辑的考古题，它的思路和现在的gmat的思路差异明显，更像lsat，强调的是语言的精确理解，只有d是一个文章说明的事实，其它都是不确定的暗示。

fyhllj

(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense. is correct.

"Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty."

cranberry

no, c is not correct. that no evedence is found dose not mean no evidence exist.

tai6996

i think the answer should be d

sunday_zhou

agree with D。other options are subjective extracted from the chairman, while D is relative objective one.

leeon

大全-B-1，答案是D,请楼主有空修改一下标题。