OG12 逻辑63 看了以前的帖 还是不懂呀 求救！！

默默楚

63. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf
and are then asked whether they can hear the
hypnotist, they reply, “No.” Some theorists try to
explain this result by arguing that the selves of
hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate
parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated
from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most
serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, “Yes”?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any
special explanation?
(C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the
hypnotist’s suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the
same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same
for all subjects?

elinkwok

选A。

因为theorists说被催眠的对象被告知自己是deaf后会分成两个parts: 1.deaf的部分 2.reply的部分deaf的那部分跟可以reply的那部分是分隔的。
那既然如此, deaf的那部分就应该不可以reply。
同时, reply的那一部分就不应该是deaf的。
可是文中的paradox是被催眠的人回答no, 而其实只要可以reply就应该回答yes. 因为deaf的那部分应该根本不会回答=,=

这个题太tricky了... 不晓得我讲的你可不可以明白=，= I tried...

默默楚

过了一个月再看这一题和你的解释 明白了 谢谢