大家帮帮忙，解答一下这道RC，谢谢！

miffyhui

坛子里有，但是还是不怎么理解，求解答！

Frazier and Mosteller assert that medical research could be improved by a move toward larger,simpler
clinical trials of medical treatments. Currently, researchers collect far more back ground information on
patients than is strictly required for their trials substantially more than hospitals collect thereby escalating
costs of data collection,storage, and analysis. Although limiting information collection could increase the
risk that researchers will overlook facts relevant to a study, Frazier and Mosteller contend that such risk,
never entirely eliminable from research, would still be small in most studies. Only in research on entirely new treatments
are new and unexpected variables likely to arise.

Frazier and Mosteller propose not only that researchers limit data collection on individual patients but also that researchers

enroll more patients in clinical trials, thereby obtaining a more representative sample
of the total population with the disease under study. Often researchers restrict
study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied. A treatment judged
successful under these ideal conditions can then be evaluated under normal conditions. Broadening the range of
trial participants,Frazier and Mosteller suggest, would enable researchers to evaluate a treatment’s
efficacy for diverse patients under various conditions and to evaluate its effectiveness for different patient subgroups.
For example,the value of a treatment for a progressive disease may vary according to a
patient’s stage of disease. Patients’ ages may also affect a treatment’s efficacy.

101. It can be inferred from the passage that a studylimited to patients like those mentioned in lines 21–23
would have which of thefollowing advantages over the kind of study proposed by Frazier and Mosteller?
(A) It would yield more data and its findings would be more accurate.

(B) It would cost less in the long term, though it would be more expensive in its initial stages.

(C) It would limit the number of　variables researchers would need to consider when evaluating the treatment under study.

(D) It would help researchers to identify subgroups of　patients with secondary conditions that might also be treatable.

(E) It would enable researchers to assess the value of　an experimental treatment for the average Patient.

这道题似懂非懂~

A选项是accurate错了吗？

bob9603

帮忙顶一下啦

miffyhui

帮忙顶一下啦

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/10/6 12:25:38)

谢谢bob~微凄凉丫

miffyhui

再顶顶～

bob9603

miffyhui，小菜建议你把21到23标记出来，要不找不到的，如果手边没有og~~~~
我看了你的题了，手边没有og，所以也不知道是哪里？
标记好了短信我哈~~~

clover928

A：
1.既然是restrict participation to patients，怎么可能会是yield more data
2.上一句已经讲了enroll more patient-->obtaining 。。。more representative sample。。。，而researchers通常是restrict participation，那就说明前者才是更accurate。

OA：C：
“Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied. ”蓝色highlight就是对应C选项的 limit the variables

个人意见哈~~open to discuss

candybecky

看它后面的一句：Atreatmentjudged successful under these ideal conditions can
(25) then be evaluated under normal conditions.
个人意见啊，这个accurate并不能infer出来，因为医生研究时控制病人只能有那一个研究中的病，但normal condition往往不是这样，就可能在临床中不accurate啦
不知道是不是这样想

miffyhui

噢，是这句：Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied.

miffyhui

A：
1.既然是restrict participation to patients，怎么可能会是yield more data
2.上一句已经讲了enroll more patient-->obtaining 。。。more representative sample。。。，而researchers通常是restrict participation，那就说明前者才是更accurate。

OA：C：
“Often researchers restrict study participation to patients who have no ailments besides those being studied. ”蓝色highlight就是对应C选项的 limit the variables
个人意见哈~~open to discuss

-- by 会员 clover928 (2012/10/7 19:52:34)

这句：researchers collect far more back ground information on patients than is strictly required for their trials substantially more than hospitals collect thereby escalating costs of data collection,storage, and analysis.
说明收集了单个病人更多的信息，个人感觉不能推出哪种方法收集的数据更多
researchers花更多功夫收集单个病人的更多信息
F提出收集更多病人的信息，限制单个病人的信息收集Frazier and Mosteller propose not only that researchers limit data collection on individual patients but also that researchers enroll more patients in clinical trials
不知道对不？

miffyhui

看它后面的一句：Atreatmentjudged successful under these ideal conditions can
(25) then be evaluated under normal conditions.
个人意见啊，这个accurate并不能infer出来，因为医生研究时控制病人只能有那一个研究中的病，但normal condition往往不是这样，就可能在临床中不accurate啦
不知道是不是这样想

-- by 会员 candybecky (2012/10/7 20:02:41)

谢谢，精确性好像是无法判断来着