ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1603|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]AWA 224范文中Q76(由于CD上关于编号的帖子打不开,只能按原来的编号了)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-30 18:13:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
"This city should be able to improve existing services and provide new ones without periodically raising the taxes of the residents. Instead, the city should require that the costs of services be paid for by developers who seek approval for their large new building projects. After all, these projects can be highly profitable to the developers, but they can also raise a city's expenses and increase the demand for its services."


Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.


范文里只有两个错误
First, the fact that developers standto make profits from their projects is not a good reason to require themto pay more than their fair share of the costsof services. In fact, to require them to do this in order to win approval oftheir projects is tantamount to robbery. Cityofficials would find it difficult to justify a policy that endorsed this practice. Moreover, the adoption ofsuch a practice would discourage the development of new buildings in the city.



Second, the increase in demand for city services as well asthe increase in the city’s expenses will be most likely offset by the taxrevenues these projects generate. Consequently, unless the author candemonstrate that the city will incur expensesthat are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, theauthor’s concern about these issues is unfounded.


第二个错误到底什么意思?


还有第三个错误吗?我想到的是“市民可能不一定有钱去消费,所以不会增加demand"
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 10:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部