绳命是如此的井彩，绳命是如此的回晃

婷婷connie

婷婷怎么又开新帖啦？923战绩如何呀？
有没有发现思羽也在我们小分队

-- by 会员 晨依Jacqueline (2012/10/8 22:18:28)

哎，纠结了，9.23是98，听力有史最低啊21啊，给跪了，要是上100我都不想考了，还想再战最后一次吧。
不参加互改，就想贴上来督促自己，这是GRE作文贴，呼呼

嘿嘿，思羽给我发短信啦~我改天给她看作文去~~

大家都加油哦~

婷婷connie

哎呀，话说我也在准备GRE 作文的说。婷婷有啥好建议分享的没。。。

-- by 会员 vanessa923 (2012/10/8 22:30:23)

婷婷觉得GRE作文的用词、句子间的逻辑很重要的说，还要一定不要自己编虚假论据，像是什么研究表明，上次考试死得很惨啊
还有作文不求量，求质，一篇文章写好了不能放，要多改，一遍一遍地改，
每天都坚持看别人写的文章，汲取经验~
加油，加油，加加油~

婷婷connie

Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.



Currently, there is a heated discussion over the main goals of scientific research. Some people suggest that it is of great value for scientists and experts to focus on research which contributes to the well-being of the majority of people, others, however, cast doubt on this by contending that special research which has unclear benefit instantly but rewarding in the long term ought to be given attention. Standing at this intersection, I am inclined to propose a balance of these distinct aims for research and my points will be demonstrated and corroborated in the following article.



At the very beginning, the principal duty for scientists is to endeavor for the most range of individuals as it is people who donate mints of tax which will be allocated for research use by the means of tax. Sponsored by the greatest number of people, brilliant scientists have the obligation to devote themselves in the laboratory. In the 1950s when the hazard of famine is faced by the Chinese people, an inevitable and imperative task for scientists is to invent kind of things which could feed people, able to lift them from the fear of starvation. Motivated by this goal, a kind of hybrid rice was invented by Yuan Longping, certainly benefiting the largest number of people. This miraculous rice is able to yield approximately 9.8 tons of rice in an hectare as well as present pest-resistance. Therefore, patronized by the people in material, scientists are incumbent to conduct research for the benefit of the major people.



Furthermore, achievements of researches can be greatly pushed up with the support from most people. In retrospect, a device which held a favorable position in competition among its counterparts is the one which won the favor of the most people. In return, with the favoritism of these people, its way to flourish was more fluent. To take the Apple private computer as a case, this machine earlier was despised by consumers because of its exorbitant price. However, prodded by the price-reduction policy with improving technology, reversion was met by the frustrating state of the computer, which has received more and more appreciation among customers fascinated with its subtle functions. An investigation unveiled that many people fell in love with the computer that they even felt uncomfortable without the company of it. Accordingly, the Apple actually becomes "the big apple" which everyone is eager to have a bite. The first half of the twentieth century witnesses the skyrocketing progress of the Apple corporation which currently performs as the fairly dreaming working place for eminent scientists. As it is the people's support that enhances the improvement of the research of scientists, researchers ought to conduct researches according to people's will.



Nevertheless, failure is confronted if we were blind to research which even though has less current benefit to the most people but still remains crucial to the nation such as the protection of the nation's security. The quality of people's life relates closely with the stabilization of a nation, so whether the nation is free from the obvious and potential threaten of other nation is the pivotal of the issue. Particularly, the research on nuclear weapon seems to havelittle stimulation to improve people's life directly at the first glance, whereas its latent contribution to the nation and the people is considerable. Owning the technology of nuclear weapon, a nation is able to maintain peaceful atmosphere for communication with other nations. With the development of technology and science, the war between two nations is no longer the rivalry of number of soldiers participated but the competition of wisdom of scientists who are proficient in nation defense technology. Under this circumstance, scientists and their research count in the protection of a country. The meaningful role of scientists' research on security is vital to the nation, resulting the stable and peaceful life of its people.



Furthermore, it is a dilemma choice for scientists and institutes to make a decision which direction can reflect the willingness of the most people. Demands vary from large number of people. As for the workers who are engaged in iron-industry, the essential direction for research in accordance to their will is how to release them from vexing physical labor work, thus scientists should concentrate on the invention of the machine which could manipulate production processes smartly resembling humans. When it comes to housewives, however, substitute by machine of house choses-preparing meals, washing dishes and sweeping the floor-is converged into another direction for these assiduous housewives have to take after little children or the senile grandparents. From this point, hardship is met on the research focus determining process, illuminating that scientists cannot successfully carry out research following people's will.



In a nutshell, it is unadvisable to conduct research covering every purpose of immediate and anticipated benefits as the capital available is limited. The main require of people should not be ignored, and by no means could research mater in the long run be derelict. As a result, we must consider comprehensively the merit of each project and make a balance plan of these two kinds of research to boost the reciprocal influence of two sides. As long as we organically combine the two foci of research will we grasp win-win opportunity.

提纲：

1.科学家的主要任务是让大多数人获益（科研经费用于人们交的tax）

2.人们对科研成果的支持进一步促进科技发展

3.科学家仍然需要致力于一些短期利益不明但有深远意义的研究，比如国家的安全问题（the security of the nation, nuclear weapon）

4.并且民众要求复杂，科学家难以抉择什么是人们最大的需求

结论：经费有限需要取舍，以为人们服务最基本宗旨，但特殊需求不妥协，综合考虑各方面， enhance the reciprocal influence of two sides，实现共赢。

vanessa923

哎呀，话说我也在准备GRE 作文的说。婷婷有啥好建议分享的没。。。

-- by 会员 vanessa923 (2012/10/8 22:30:23)

婷婷觉得GRE作文的用词、句子间的逻辑很重要的说，还要一定不要自己编虚假论据，像是什么研究表明，上次考试死得很惨啊
还有作文不求量，求质，一篇文章写好了不能放，要多改，一遍一遍地改，
每天都坚持看别人写的文章，汲取经验~
加油，加油，加加油~

-- by 会员 婷婷connie (2012/10/9 16:32:33)

嗯，逻辑确实重要。嗯听你的，不编研究表明呵呵，那自己的例子可以说么。。。
额我现在就一直注重量呢，希望多写写出感觉来。照你这么说，我是应该好好看看写过的文章了。可是逻辑什么的自己还是很混乱的说。好吧，多看优秀范文，多学习。
共同加油呵呵。

婷婷connie

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.



Currently, an increasing number of experts on education point out that governments are supposed to offer equal opportunities for students who have received the admission from universities by patronizing underprivileged students. However, this view also provokes disagreement among citizens contending the limitation of capital and resource for education. The information I have collected over the last two years leads me to believe that rational use of this policy certainly brings more merits to the largest number of people. Specifical examples and justifications will be demonstrated in the following article.



At the very beginning, I concede that this arriving policy is, to some degree, unfair to students whose family is able to afford the tuition fees. According to Socrates, the world is consist of contraries which can be applied well to this case. While some students are faced with embarrassment when asked to pay for education fees, other students who are able to tackle fees with ease for their parents may be attorney, physician or CEO of a profitable company. The latter group of students and even their families probably view this policy as a representative of inequality since chances are slight for them to receive the grants, loans and other financial assistance from the federal government, state government as well as the university. Thus, conflict between the economically advantaged students and their counterparts will come into being, which exerts negative influence on the implementation of the policy.



Furthermore, hampered by the current state of educational source, the policy which lift poor students from the tension of tuition fees may not feasible. We can imagine that with the popularization of this policy, universities and colleges will encounter a skyrocketing number of students subsuming both ordinary and underprivileged students. Since the capacity of classrooms and laboratories may fail to expand at a rate catching the one of the rampant rise in student's number, the result can be foreseen that the overall quality of the education will be weakened sharply, ending up with the dissatisfaction of both sides of students, which backfires in the original purpose of the policy. Therefore, this policy can be adopt by governments rationally only if governmental officials have considered the circumstances comprehensively and full foundation for the policy has been committed.



Nevertheless, we ought not to neglect the positive aspects of this policy. The improvement of the sense of competition among students is the firstbenefit rendered by the action. In retrospect to the traditional system of education, the opportunity to receive education was merely a symbol of fortune: only the child whose family was rich enough was able to come to private schools in the stare of others with admiration. Thus these children had never experienced the feeling of competition. Whereas in modern society, with the ballooning number of preeminent students who owns littletreasure but sponsored by governments, rivalries are much fierce among people who are eager to make a different in their universities and colleges. Luckily, accommodating this changing environment, students at present behave progressively: they study with great effort to make preparation to seize the coming chances. So, from this point, the merit of the policy cannot be underestimated.



Moreover, the policy plays an essential role in the enhancement of the public as the policy broadens the range of people who become educated. To take China as a case, resulted from the uneven distribution of people's fortune (relatively large part of fortune is owned by small number of people), hardship is faced for most people to cover the tuition fees for universities and colleges, thus they have little access to the the complex knowledge which can be only taught in the process of high education. However, the policy pitches a light on the mire by encouraging  the enrollment of economically disadvantaged students who present extraordinary inspiration and effort on study. Concentrated on the intriguing lectures and fabulous laboratory work, this group of students are more likely to have a well mastery of knowledge taught in campus, even benefiting the education of the next generation. With the more number of students participating in campus,  the proportion of people who are learned is bigger and bigger, which casts conducive impact on the development of the culture of a nation.



In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, we are able to see the demerits and merits of the policy. Even if the demerits are severe superficially, we are supposed to hold an optimistic attitude towards it. As long as we exploit the policy with full rationality and circumspection, the demerits can be lessened and ultimately merits of the policy will far outweigh demerits.

提纲：

1.这会对能付得起学费人不公平(eliminate discrepancies in opportunities for advantaged and disadvantaged students)

2.更多的人入学会造成教育资源不足，may not feasible

3.能提高大家的竞争意识

4.提高全民素质

结论：合理采用，weaken the demerits, ultimately make merits far outweigh demerits

婷婷connie

哎呀，话说我也在准备GRE 作文的说。婷婷有啥好建议分享的没。。。

-- by 会员 vanessa923 (2012/10/8 22:30:23)

婷婷觉得GRE作文的用词、句子间的逻辑很重要的说，还要一定不要自己编虚假论据，像是什么研究表明，上次考试死得很惨啊
还有作文不求量，求质，一篇文章写好了不能放，要多改，一遍一遍地改，
每天都坚持看别人写的文章，汲取经验~
加油，加油，加加油~

-- by 会员 婷婷connie (2012/10/9 16:32:33)

嗯，逻辑确实重要。嗯听你的，不编研究表明呵呵，那自己的例子可以说么。。。
额我现在就一直注重量呢，希望多写写出感觉来。照你这么说，我是应该好好看看写过的文章了。可是逻辑什么的自己还是很混乱的说。好吧，多看优秀范文，多学习。
共同加油呵呵。

-- by 会员 vanessa923 (2012/10/9 18:57:00)

自己的例子可以用，不过感觉GRE的例子都好大啊，就是deduction，例子都是概括性，不需要太具体了~

晨依Jacqueline

原来是GRE写作贴啊 我要好好膜拜一下！加油加油！
这次要是多两分你就不进步了，ETS是在鼓励你变身大牛哦！

chasedreamabc

我是婷婷的NC粉儿。。。。保佑我上29+
到时候一定来还愿

婷婷connie

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.



Currently, there is an increasing popular discussion among citizens whether the government is supposed to give precedence on immediate problems over anticipated ones. Some people manifest that the foundation of the solutions to future problems lies in the settlement ofcurrent fairs, others, however, place considerable emphasis on future problems. Standing at this intersection, I am inclined to hold aview that government should balance the concentration on both these two sorts of problems.



At first, immediate problems are so emergent that require the most effective and direct solutions. To take the subsistence problem as a case,although the average people residing in Europe and America are proved to enjoy a high life standard-health and safety, individual autonomy and freedom and cultural richness, most of Africans are still living a miserable life, faced with hazards of exposure and starvation. Here, the overriding imperative for governments of African nations is how to save their people from the fear of famine and then to improve the well-being of overall citizenry. We can imagine that once the government succeeds in getting out of this quandary, public disaffection will be greatly undermined and chances are slight that a "civil war" will be provoked between the people of the nation and the government military. Thus, the immediate problems which are of importance ought to be put at the first place when government formulate the plan for the nation.



Furthermore, the development of future could be guaranteed only if the current matters are figured out. According to Socrates, the future comes from the present, which can be well applied to this point. The policy enhancing persistent development is a good case. In order to maintain the ever-increasing trend, the government officials as well as biologists put forward with the perspective that humans must be friendly to the environment since human beings and the nature are vexingly interwound. Specifically, the release of carbon dioxide, a major kind of greenhouse gas, derived from processes of industrialized production, is gradually depleting our ozone sphere and heating the earth's atmosphere, thus causing unredeemable consequences. Accordingly, the global warming casts threatens to the coastal countries and ones in island by the increasing sea level. Besides, the anomalous climate on the planet also does harm to the agriculture,transportation business, and so on. These exert large negative influence on the economy of the nation and people's life, not mention the future development. In the sake of sustainable progress, an unavoidable task for the government is setting up powerful measures to deal with the environmental issues.



However, any government that is blind to the anticipated problems cannot afford it, either. In the aim to get the largest benefits, the government should set sight over the whole circumstances. It becomes justifiable to sacrifice some current merits to boost the larger value in the future. For instance, the Three Gorges, a world-famous water conservancy project used for storing water and preventing floods, received enormous disagreement at the beginning of its construction. Contending that the project compels the transmigration of the inhabitants living along the Yangtze River, a relatively big number of experts challenged this decision. While having considering cautiously the intriguing benefits brought to the next generations, such as the protection of the regions in the following reach and its potential in electricity generation,the government ultimately launched the plan in 1994. Luckily, it turns out that it results in the larger interests in the long term when giving away some present benefits.



By the way, the hardship can be met if we are bigoted to solve the immediate troubles because of their complexity. Therefore, we have to put these vexing problems into the list attached the label of long run plans. The population in China is the one that stricks me at this moment. Left by the historical causes, China is now encountering one of its most serious and knotty problems. It is also the root of the matter of employment and the gap between the rich and the poor. In spite of the implementation of birth control policy for approximately half a century, the number of the population is still soaring, which is predicted to rise up to 1.4 billion at the start of 2015. Yet we fails to take any other effective measures to hamper its increment but wait to witness the sluggish effects of the current policy(as time elapse, the increasing rate of population may be slowed down and even below zero). So, under this case, the immediate problems are faced with too many barriers to be settled down.  



In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, we could apparently become aware of the urge to solve the immediate problems, which, however, may be prevented to be worked out with considering of some other occasions like the Three Gorgers and the complexity of some current fairs. On the other hand, pondering the overall circumstances, the anticipated ones are equally significant. The government needs to be alert to the vagarious conditions of both current and anticipated problems,thus pays concern according to the different traits of cases. Only adopting a balance of the two directions will the government make it to shape a brighter future for its citizens.

提纲：

1.时间紧迫，急需解决（subsistence problem）

2.解决好现在，才能保证未来的发展（co2排放，环境，资源）

3.政府应该用长远目光看问题，有时需要牺牲部分利益（the Three Gorges）

4.有些问题难以解决需从长计议（人口多，birth control，就业，贫富差距）

结论：所以需要balance，不同问题不同对待。

婷婷connie

原来是GRE写作贴啊 我要好好膜拜一下！加油加油！
这次要是多两分你就不进步了，ETS是在鼓励你变身大牛哦！

-- by 会员 晨依Jacqueline (2012/10/9 22:05:08)

求晨依帮我一起攒人品吧~~
嘿嘿