loveluyuanbai的作文帖 狠批~~

loveluyuanbai

In the reading passage,the auther concludes that there are three ways to address to the extinction of Torreya.While the lecturer do not in favor of the opinion,he states that none of the three ways can make a difference of Torreya from dying out,which on the other hand contradict what the auther in the reading passage concludes.The lecturer unfolds her disagreeement for the following reasons.
In the first place,the reading passage gives a opinion that reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years can bring this kind of species back to life.Whereas the lecturer hardly agree to that,the reason is that Torreya in recent years does not influenced by the single element,which is given above in the reading passage.Torreya is now affected by the whole climates of Florida,which nowadays has a extremely high temperature due to the global warming.Moreover,many places are getting drier and do not suit for the living of Torreya,so in other words there are nowhere for Torreya survive against the extinction.
Furthermore,another really inevitable problem the lecturer give to us is the plant migration，which will deny the suggestion in the reading passage that move Torreya to an different location.The lecturer implys that the migration of other plants will adversely do a lot of harm to the surviving of Torreya,including the other species will spread that much quickly,take much places of Torreya,eventually will kill off new trees or plants.So in this case, this solution of the reading passage can be meaningless and should be ruled out due to the unexpectable causes of other species.
Finally,perserving Torreya in research centers and let scientists do some useful experiments to keep them prosperous are considerd the third way to handle the extinction of Torreya.However,the lecturer takes into account of miniscule population of Torreya,which in this way the scientists can not even make a sound experiment due to such limited account of specimens.In this case,the third method can also be another invalid solution.

chengzaaaa

橙子改的10.8的独立！
若有改的不对的地方再交流哦！多多指教！

loveluyuanbai

10.9
It's more important for the government to build art museums and music performance center than to build recreational devices (such as swimming pool, playgrounds)

Nowadays, with the rapid development of economy and fierce competitive situation,it is obvious that people are more likely to pay their whole focus on the career level and neglect the issue about some mental activities,in this case art and music are the essential methods for them to enhance their mental health.From my perspective, I consider art museums and music performance centers some vital elments for body health,which will absolutely more important than build some recreational devices for the following reasons.

In the first place, as I just said in the first paragraph,the subjects which include art education and music learning are necessary parts in all human daily life.Imagine your life without art or music,you will never get close to your soul and lose the way to experience colorful stuffs.Moreover,art museums and music perfromance centers are kinds of residences which we can get that intensively close to soul,I can hardly wonder what will happen without these things in our life.While the recreational devices are kinds of unnecessaries that we can not really live with.The residents in cities will never get that close to these things,which in other ways will be built without governments’funds,in other words the market will see the needs to that stuffs and eventually meets their needs.So the government does not bother buliding that stuffs.
Fruthermore,the building like the public art museums and music preformance centers can aid in govenments and help to make a profits in return.Someone will argue that the recreational devices can also do a lot of good to the governments in turn.These people make a hugh loophole here due to the neglection of market needs.Like I just told you above,the recreational devices are abundant in almost all of cities,the phenomenon provides fact that the market meets the need in recreational devices and the government do not get involved there.So why not the government let recreational devices alone and be focus on the single issue of building mental health devices instead.If the government can cover this area and spare no effort to make it,we can not deny the development of mental health here.
Admittedly, in some cities especially some rural areas, the market there does not afford such enormous needs for the building of recreational devices,that is to say in these areas the governments should also aid in building recreational devices,because sometimes people also have rights to relax in such places.In these areas,the building of mental health devices and recreational devices should synchronized ,which means that the government should be more cautious to distribute the whole funds to each area.However,in recent years,people are getting along with an excess of recreational devices due to such a prosperous society.And the more important misson for the government is to build the devices of mental health firstly.
In conclusion, as I just unfold my opinion above,I just in favor of the argument that the government should pay more attention on the building of art museums and music performance centers in most cases.But if there are places really lack of recreational devices,the govenrment also have the responsibility to satisfy them.

Yeeisstrong

TPO 18


In the reading passage, the auther concludes that there are three ways to address to the extinction of Torreya. While the lecturer do not in favor of the opinion, he(it) states that none of the three ways can make a difference of Torreya from dying out, which on the other hand contradict what the auther in the reading passage concludes. The lecturer unfolds her disagreeement for the following reasons.
In the first place, the reading passage gives a opinion that reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years can bring this kind of species back to life. Whereas thelecturer hardly agree to that, the reason is that Torreya in recent years does not influenced by the single element, which is given above in the reading passage. Torreya is now affected by the whole climates of Florida, which nowadays has a extremely high temperature due to the global warming. Moreover, many places are getting drier and do not suit for the living of Torreya, so in other words there are nowhere for Torreya survive against the extinction.
Furthermore, another really inevitable problem the lecturer give to us is the plant migration，which will deny the suggestion in the reading passage that move Torreya to an different location. The lecturerimplys that the migration of other plants will adversely do a lot of harm to the surviving of Torreya, including the other species will spread that much quickly(quick), take much places of Torreya, eventually will kill off new trees or plants. So in this case, this solution of the reading passage can be meaningless and should be ruled out due to theunexpectable causes of other species.
Finally, perserving Torreya in research centers and let scientists do some useful experiments to keep them prosperous are considerd the third way to handle the extinction of Torreya. However, the lecturer takes into account of miniscule population of Torreya, which in this way the scientists can not even make a sound experiment due to such limited account of specimens. In this case, the third method can also be another invalid solution.



注意小的词性和拼写问题啊，我总是打错哎，，，加油！

loveluyuanbai

10.10
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Movies are worth watching only when they teach us something about the real life.

Nowadays,various communication medias are spreading over the socitey,in other words, people in recent years are paying more attention on these kinds of medias,especially in this case movies stand out against other medias.However,another question just drops out.Are movies worth watching only when they are something about the real life?You know,these years due to the rapid development of technology,there are a boom in science fictions,which are striking sbujects of movies.Are these kinds of movies really do not worth watching?While from my perspective,I totally disgree with this kind of opinion for the following reasons.
In the first place,these years a lot of diverse subjects of movies have been put into the market,and these kind of different movies just meet the need of different tastes of people.Some people just get over with their boring life,and they want to experience the life that they have never thought of before.In this way,the subject about science fiction which give us a totally different vision of life just meets their needs.And to be honest,these kinds of movie just worth watching because the creativity,the inovation,the reamarkable thinking pattern,ect.These things are really needed in some parts of departments.And it just can make a enormous difference on the obsolete working stuffs.Moreover,these things are incrediable precious in the 21st century,and the people well eqiupped these thinking will really make a profit in career.
Furthermore, the movies are not only worth watching if they do actually contain something about real life.Apart from the science fiction above,the cartoon for children or the anime for adults can in other way do a lot of good to people.The cartoon for children first,this subject indeed aid in beautifying children’s life and really do a hugh relieve for their parents in return.We can hardly take a thought of someday the cartoon get extinct,what our life will be ?Especially for someone who has a happy family,what will they do when their children just in mood and there are never some imaginable cartoon figures coming to life.The same to adults who just get used to enjoy anime when they just back to home and want to relax,they can never get back to the innocent childhood with full of imagination.What these terribe results if we just give up watching these lovely movies.
Admittedly,we can never deny that some movies about real life can better equipped us with a lot of useful tools,different thinking patterns,considerable amout of experiences which we can try to put in our daily life.Moveover,we just can not give up these movies too is we want to take a more close glance of our life and learn something about ourselves.However,if anyone want me to take a pick of these different subjects of movies,I will never respond because I totally can not make a easy choice.I sincerely want all these kinds of movies in my life,don’t you?
In conclusion, like I just told you above,none of the single subjects of movies can satify me,because what I want in my life is always full of something real,something creative,something just innocent.All these things will make up my whole life.

loveluyuanbai

In the reading passage, the arguer concludes that “let it burn”policy has a lot of negative effects on some issues for a couple of reasons,while in this case the lecturer in the listening material refute that kind of opinion by giving the facts against these opinions.
In the first place,the arguer in the reading passage states that the policy attributes some tree damages and tree vegetation,which in the same way get some scorched areas eventually.While in the listening material the lecturer gives full disagreement about this opinion,she gives specific facts that the forest fire can give other opportunites for the new trees and plants and let them be prosperous and diverse again,especially for some species which can endure the more heated temperature.So in other words,that is really a new chance for these species to give birth in such circumstance.
Furthermore,the reading passage gives us another information which imfers that the number of wildlife may get much more declined due to the forest fire.O the contrary, the lecturer do not in favor of this argument by leaving that this seemly severe phenomenon may work adversely.Which means that it also give other species new chance to grow due to the decline of the wildlife.Moreover,it indeed gives these new species some brand habitats to let them give birth.Eventually these species’perdators can get more stronger in return,and it also can build some more solid chains in the animal world.
The last, the arguer also contends that the forest can cause some negative consequence for the local economy due to the unstable weather changing after the forest fire such as little rain and strong wind.However,the lecturer oppose that by expound the unusual weather is not exist forever,which means that is will never happen again and maybe will dismissed in a couple of mouths.Eventually,the toutists will get back and the economy will warm up.

margrate

1010综合  FROM MARGRATE

himiko0607

10.10独立作文修改

loveluyuanbai

恩 说的很对 我的确喜欢用这些词啊。。。感觉像是在对话一样 不正规也。。。慢慢改正