付图图的作文帖 求调教！！求蹂躏！！

fuzhengrui

综合写作：

TPO12
The reading material considers a professionally painted, full-length portrait of teenage girl as Jane Austen. However, the lecturer thinks the reasons given by the reading are unconvincing and even questionable at best for the following three reasons.

To begin with, it was almost 70 years later when Austen's family had given permission to use the portrait as an illustration, and none of her family saw her in flesh or knew what she looked like exactly. So they were not certain that the portrait was Jane Austen.

Furthermore, Austen was a large family and several teenage girls resembled each other. So it is likely that the portrait or the sketch was not Jane. Besides, the girl was recognized as a distant niece of Jane.

Additionally, the subject of the painting is not necessarily Jane. The stamp on the back of the painting shows that the canvas used in the portrait was sold twenty-seven years later. And at that time, Jane Austen was no longer a teenager.

In conclusion, the lecturer refutes the reading about whether the portrait depicted Jane Austen and he thinks it is not her.

fuzhengrui

TPO13

It is believed in the reading material that it is unfortunate for scientists and the general public to be inaccessible to fossils. The lecturer, however, holds the exactly opposite view for the following three reasons.

To begin with, the public are more likely to be exposed to the fossils if they are sold to private collectors. During the trades, the public is able to see the fossils which schools and museums cannot afford.

Furthermore, if some fossils are going to be sold, they will be fully examined to prove their value by scientists first. In the process of examinations, scientists must scrutiny them to make sure that no evidence is missed out.

Additionally, much more fossils would be undiscovered if there were less private collectors. Although some data about locations may be ignored, it is much better to find the fossils rather than leave them undiscovered.

In conclusion, the reading negates fossil trades while the lecturer thinks them useful for the public as well as research.

fuzhengrui

9月8日

独立写作：

Do you agree with the following statement? The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees.



There are a lot of things that companies can do to make their business more successful and make more profits. From my perspective, although there are more methods that promote the profits for the companies, improving the skill of its employees is the most important way for a company to prosper its business.

Better-trained employees work more effectively and efficiently than others and they are capable of using different ways to solve problems. Before computers were first introduced into offices, my father and his colleagues had to draw accurate designs of architectures on the draft even for 4 consecutive days, which cost them lots of energy and time. As soon as computers were available in offices, the boss of the company invited a computer engineer to teach the staff about the computer skills. My father took 3 month to figure out how to operate the computer and draw whatever he wanted on the screen. Drawing has never been a headache in my father’s job and the staff has paid much more attention on the stability of their architectures. Their efficiency improved almost 3 times than before. Therefore, skilled employees bring effectiveness and efficiency to the company, which is vital to company’s survival.

Another reason for more skilled employees is that they are less likely to make errors. If there is nobody skilled on the pipeline or assembly line in a company, a supervisor for quality control is a must. But the question is, avoiding making errors doesn’t make a company stand out from its competitors. Therefore, the production has to be right from the very beginning, which requires skilled staff to make sure. Unskilled workers are prone to errors and they are not likely to find them until something goes wrong. So the more skilled employees are, the greater chance it is for the company to make large amount of money and have prosperous business.

Admittedly, other ways of investment are not bad for the develop of companies.

Advanced facilities are able to make up workers’ low efficiency to some extent and better welfare arouses the enthusiasm of employees to be more devoted to work. But they are not the point. Companies are financially-burden if purchasing advanced facilities whose costs can be enormous figures. Compared to teach workers skills, welfares fail to allow workers to have a feeling of their increasing competence or capabilities. Thus, it is shown that more skills are good for both companies as well as employees.

To sum up, if I were the boss of a company now, I would not hesitate to invest in training my employees. After all, it is skills that counts to determine how competitive the company is as well as how promising the employee is.

fuzhengrui

独立写作：

Do you agree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families.



Taking good care of the family has been an outstanding problem for the young generation who are suffering from high pressure from work. Even so, increasing prices of daily necessities and houses aggravate this problem. People from both rural areas and urban areas are confronted with the same difficulties. From my perspective, living in cities is better for people to take good care of the family.

The medical system in urban areas is more developed than those in rural areas. Hospitals in urban areas are equipped with more advanced medical devices and experienced doctors, which provides people with more credible diagnostic results and efficacious drugs. When it comes to fatal diseases such as cancer, patients have to go to big cities to receive treatments because most hospitals in rural areas are not qualified to do so. Besides, if one of the family members is suddenly in coma, an ambulance is supposed to arrive within five minutes to give first aids. The more developed the medical system is, the less likely it is for family members to suffer from illness. In this sense, urban areas are ideal for people to take good care of their family members.

Not only are better treatments provided in cities, ways of entertainment are various as well. In urban areas, more cinemas are available so that a family can spend two hours on a movie together on weekends. What’s more, shopping malls are excellent places for families to visit because they are able to buy shoes or clothes for other members, which offers them chances to promote their feelings. Furthermore, taking part in team training camp never fails to bring laughter and trust among family members. In rural areas, however, places and facilities for these activities cannot be easily found. Therefore, people from rural areas are less likely to enjoy the convenience and joy of modernization.

Admittedly, living in cities has its own setbacks. Prices are much higher than that in rural areas, and both employers and office workers are more likely to be stressed out because of the fierce competition. In order to enjoy the benefits of big cities, many people have to devote their leisure time to working or going to other cities on business and suffer from high prices as well as enormous workload. So their little kids and the elderly may have to deal with loneliness on weekdays. However, in rural areas, people do not need to work that long. Even they are at work, the kids and elderly can drop in on others and talk about trivia and have a cup of tea. And it is indeed a very relaxing lifestyle.

To sum up, despite loneliness, family members are better taken care of in urban areas because advanced medical system and various ways of entertainment are available in cities rather than rural areas.

pedrohuo

There are a lot of things that companies can do to make their business more successful and make more profits. From my perspective, although there are more methods that promote the profits for the companies, improving the skill of its employees is the most important way for a company to prosper its business.
Better-trained employees work more effectively and efficiently than others and they are capable of using different ways to solve problems. Before computers were first introduced into offices, my father and his colleagues had to draw accurate designs of architectures on the draft even for 4 consecutive days, which cost them lots of energy and time. As soon as computers were available in offices, the boss of the company invited a computer engineer to teach the staff about the computer skills. My father took 3 month to figure out how to operate the computer and draw whatever he wanted on the screen. Drawing has never been a headache in my father’s job and the staff has paid much more attention on the stability of their architectures. （例子很好）Their efficiency improved almost 3 times than before. Therefore, skilled employees bring effectiveness and efficiency to the company, which is vital to company’s survival.

Another reason for more skilled employees is that they are less likely to make errors. If there is nobody skilled on the pipeline or assembly line in a company, a supervisor for quality control is a must. But the question is, avoiding making errors doesn’t make a company stand out from its competitors.(这句话总感觉有点绕。和本段的意思不太贴切。我读了好几遍。) Therefore, the production has to be right from the very beginning, which requires skilled staff to make sure. Unskilled workers are prone to errors and they are not likely to find them until something goes wrong. So the more skilled employees are, the greater chance it is for the company to make large amount of money and have prosperous business.

Admittedly, other ways of investment are not bad for the develop(development) of companies.

Advanced facilities are able to make up workers’ low efficiency to some extent and better welfare arouses the enthusiasm of employees to be more devoted to work. But they are not the point. Companies are financially-burden if purchasing advanced facilities whose costs can be enormous figures. Compared to teach workers skills, welfares fail to allow workers to have a feeling of their increasing competence or capabilities. Thus, it is shown that more skills are good for both companies as well as employees.

To sum up, if I were the boss of a company now, I would not hesitate to invest in training my employees. After all, it is skills that counts(count) to determine how competitive the company is as well as how promising the employee is.
图图的作文总是这么好。用词用句都太漂亮了。向付同志致敬。

fuzhengrui

Taking good care of the family has been an outstanding problem for the young generation who are suffering from high pressure from work. Even so, increasing prices of daily necessities and houses aggravate this problem. People from both rural areas and urban areas are confronted with the same difficulties. From my perspective, living in cities is better for people to take good care of the family.

The medical system in urban areas is more developed than those in rural areas. Hospitals in urban areas are equipped with more advanced medical devices and experienced doctors, which provides people with more credible diagnostic results and efficacious drugs. When it comes to fatal diseases such as cancer, patients have to go to big cities to receive treatments because most hospitals in rural areas are not qualified to do so. Besides, if one of the family members is suddenly in coma, an ambulance is supposed to arrive within five minutes to give first aids. The more developed the medical system is, the less likely it is for family members to suffer from illness. In this sense, urban areas are ideal for people to take good care of their family members.

Not only are better treatments provided in cities, ways of entertainment are various as well. In urban areas, more cinemas are available so that a family can spend two hours on a movie together on weekends. What’s more, shopping malls are excellent places for families to visit because they are able to buy shoes or clothes for other members, which offers them chances to promote their feelings. Furthermore, taking part in team training camp never fails to bring laughter and trust among family members. In rural areas, however, places and facilities for these activities cannot be easily found. Therefore, people from rural areas are less likely to enjoy the convenience and joy of modernization.

Admittedly, living in cities has its own setbacks. Prices are much higher than that in rural areas, and both employers and office workers are more likely to be stressed out because of the fierce competition. In order to enjoy the benefits of big cities, many people have to devote their leisure time to working or going to other cities on business and suffer from high prices as well as enormous workload. So their little kids and the elderly may have to deal with loneliness on weekdays. However, in rural areas, people do not need to work that long. Even they are at work, the kids and elderly can drop in on others and talk about trivia and have a cup of tea. And it is indeed a very relaxing lifestyle.

To sum up, despite loneliness, family members are better taken care of in urban areas because advanced medical system and various ways of entertainment are available in cities rather than rural areas.

E月羽

It is believed in the reading material that it is unfortunate for scientists and the general public to be inaccessible to fossils. The lecturer, however, holds the exactly opposite view for the following three reasons.

To begin with, the public are more likely to be exposed to the fossils if they are sold to private collectors. During the trades, the public is able to see the fossils which schools and museums cannot afford.

Furthermore, if some fossils are going to be sold, they will be fully examined to prove their value（values 应该是可数名词吧？） by scientists first. In the process of examinations, scientists must scrutiny them to make sure that no evidence is missed out.

Additionally, much more fossils would be undiscovered if there were less private collectors. Although some data about locations may be ignored, it is much better to find the fossils rather than leave them undiscovered.

In conclusion, the reading negates fossil trades while the lecturer thinks them useful for the public as well as research.

1.   有的点阅读内容没有提到。
2.    你的观点和我听到的有点不同啊
听力部分需要提取的观点是：

- Main point: 私人化石买卖利大于弊

- Sub point 1: 公众不会失去接触化石的机会，反而更多，因为一些科学机构可以购买化石来给公众参观

- Sub point 2: 科学家也不会失去接触化石的机会，因为珍贵的化石需要认证， 会第一时间到达科学家的手中，所以科学家不会错过得到化石信息的机会

- Sub point 3: 尽管化石的珍贵数据可能遭到破坏，但是要好过让大量化石长眠于地下

fuzhengrui

我听到的和你写的是一样的。。。应该是我写的问题。
阅读我以前以为是不用写的。。。在以后综合写作里面我加上阅读的内容

It is believed in the reading material that it is unfortunate for scientists and the general public to be inaccessible to fossils. The lecturer, however, holds the exactly opposite view for the following three reasons.

To begin with, the public are more likely to be exposed to the fossils if they are sold to private collectors. During the trades, the public is able to see the fossils which schools and museums cannot afford.

Furthermore, if some fossils are going to be sold, they will be fully examined to prove their value（values 应该是可数名词吧？） by scientists first. In the process of examinations, scientists must scrutiny them to make sure that no evidence is missed out.

Additionally, much more fossils would be undiscovered if there were less private collectors. Although some data about locations may be ignored, it is much better to find the fossils rather than leave them undiscovered.

In conclusion, the reading negates fossil trades while the lecturer thinks them useful for the public as well as research.

1.   有的点阅读内容没有提到。
2.    你的观点和我听到的有点不同啊
听力部分需要提取的观点是：

- Main point: 私人化石买卖利大于弊

- Sub point 1: 公众不会失去接触化石的机会，反而更多，因为一些科学机构可以购买化石来给公众参观

- Sub point 2: 科学家也不会失去接触化石的机会，因为珍贵的化石需要认证， 会第一时间到达科学家的手中，所以科学家不会错过得到化石信息的机会

- Sub point 3: 尽管化石的珍贵数据可能遭到破坏，但是要好过让大量化石长眠于地下

-- by 会员 E月羽 (2012/9/9 21:17:46)

fuzhengrui

9月9日综合写作TPO14：

The reading material talks about three advantages of salvage logging after forest fires and severe storms. The lecturer, however, holds the opposite view and negates salvage logging for the following three reasons.

To begin with, removing dead trees is not as beneficial as what says in the reading. The decomposition of dead trees is supposed to enrich the soil for future generations. Otherwise, future generations would have to suffer from the lack of nutrients.

Furthermore, spruce bark beetles have been living in decaying wood for one hundred years without causing any damage to the forests. Besides, decaying wood is home to birds and other insects. Removing dead wood will exert a negative effect on environmental health.

Additionally, helicopters are needed to transport the wood in severely damaged forest, which is too expensive to maintain. Salvaging logging is a temporary job and experienced outsiders will compete with local people for the job opportunities. Therefore, jobs are not easily available for local people.

In conclusion, the reading material claims that salvage logging is beneficial for forest recover, health of the forest and local employment. In contrast, the lecturer thinks that it is not good for long-term development and it may do no good for local people.

fuzhengrui

9月10日综合写作TPO15：

The reading material provides us three ways to control the cane toad population in Australia. The lecturer, however, thinks they are not effective to get rid of cane toads for the following three reasons.

To begin with, grown cane toads may be prevented by national fences, but young ones and eggs are not because they are usually found in streams and rivers. The water current is able to carry baby cane toad and eggs through the fences, which enable them to colonize on the other side of fences.

Moreover, volunteers are capable for killing cane toads by hand and destroy their eggs. The point is that most of them are untrained, so they are not sure of the difference between baby native frogs and baby cane frogs. Therefore, it is likely that they kill native frogs inadvertently.

Additionally, special virus is able to prevent cane toads form maturing and reproducing without harming other reptile or amphibian species indeed. However, some cane toads are transported to central America, where they were originated. Virus may cause environmental disasters there as they play a vital role in the ecosystem.

In conclusion, the lecturer negates three ways to control the population of cane toad which are put forward by the reading.