9.5 综合改文 TPO10 红色错误,蓝色讨论,高亮赞~
The reading material argues (that) the pollution hypothesis seems more plausible to explain the repaid(rapid) decline of sea otters. The lecturer, however, holds the view that attacks by predators are the culprit (这个词挺好,但是逻辑不对应,attacks怎么会是culprit,应该是predators are the culprit)in the following three aspects.
First, no dead sea otters(otters’ bodies是尸体没有找到)have been found around(off)the Alaskan coast, which disproves the pollution theory. That piece of evidence is consistent with the predator theory that sea otters are eaten up by their predators.
Second, human hunters' involvement deprives the predators of their food(orcas of their food whales) and predators have to change their diets to other sea mammals such as seals and sea lions. Therefore, it is not the pollutants that kill the sea otters(, but orcas).
Third, the predators of sea otters do not like to live in(are not accessible to这里不是它们不喜欢,而是身体太大,去不了) rocky and shallow water areas, where the amount of sea otters remains the same(stable). This piece ofevidence proves the predator theory as well. Therefore, it is not the diffusion of pollutants that cause(causes) the uneven decline in sea otters.
Conclusion:
1.每一段的连词可以换一下,像moreover, additionally, what is more之类的,用first, second, third有点单调哦
2.词汇很丰富的说
3.有一些细节还要抓紧,像第二段的orca,最好点一下
4.总的来说,写的还是不错的~
|