ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: RicosRed
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 补充题 24-20

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2005-2-14 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
我选E, 我认为AS.....AS 后的省略形式, 当动词为助动词或情态动词时可省略,实意动词不能省略主语,容易造成歧义.
32#
发表于 2005-2-16 17:56:00 | 只看该作者

UP UP UP!!!

33#
发表于 2005-2-16 20:06:00 | 只看该作者

我选D,as可以在比较结构中代替主语。也可以看作是省略了主语。


those指代institutions的话,感觉比较就不对了,就成了institution charge的数目和institution之间的比较了。


Open to discussion!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-16 20:16:22编辑过]
34#
发表于 2005-2-17 01:27:00 | 只看该作者

投E一票啦.

35#
发表于 2005-2-17 21:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用doyoudo在2005-2-14 15:27:00的发言:
我选E, 我认为AS.....AS 后的省略形式, 当动词为助动词或情态动词时可省略,实意动词不能省略主语,容易造成歧义.


同意,有道理
36#
发表于 2005-3-3 10:16:00 | 只看该作者
I chose D.
37#
发表于 2005-3-4 11:46:00 | 只看该作者

觉得两个选项语法上和逻辑意义上都没错,一个是定语从句修饰(institutions that charge...), 一个是分词修饰.

但是根据ETS对平行的偏好,还是选D把.

(没有更有力的论证,还是不塌实的说..)

38#
发表于 2005-3-4 11:54:00 | 只看该作者

所有我能找到OG上的离子:

132. According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities.

(A)  equivalent to the enrollment of

(B)  the equivalent of those enrolled in

(C)  equal to those who are enrolled in

(D)  as many as the enrollment of

(E)   as many as are enrolled in

The phrases equivalent to in A, the equivalent of in B, and equal to in C have too broad a range of meanings to be used precisely here: that is, they can suggest more than merely numerical equality. Also, as quantitative expressions, equiva­lent and equal often modify nouns referring to uncountable things, as in "an equivalent amount of resistance" or "a volume of water equal to Lake Michigan." To establish numerical comparability between groups with countable members, the phrase as many as is preferable. Choice D, however, uses this phrase improperly in comparing eight million people to enrollment, not to other people. The comparison in E, the best choice, is logical because people is understood as the subject of are enrolled.

省略 people

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.

(A)  there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(B)  there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(C)  there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were

(D)  every thirty-two pupils now have one micro­computer, four times as many than there were

(E)   every thirty-two pupils now has one microcom­puter, four times as many as

Choices A, B, and C appropriately use the construction "one X for every thirty-two Y's" to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the "one X ..." construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

省略 computers

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.

(A)  Americans were killed as

(B)  Americans were killed than

(C)  Americans were killed than those who

(D)  more Americans were killed as there

(E)   more Americans were killed as those who

Choice A, the best answer, is the only option that accurately expresses the comparison by using the idiomatic form as many... as. In B and C, as many ... than is unidiomatic, and in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion. In D and E, more is redundant because the phrase four times as many in the original sentence conveys the idea of more.

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A)  so many changes at once as they had in

(B)  at once as many changes as

(C)  at once as many changes that there were with

(D)  as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E)   so many changes at once that confronted them in

Choice D is the best answer, stating grammatically and clearly that, with the 1986 Tax Reform Act, taxpayers confronted more simultaneous changes than ever before. In choice A, the past perfect had [confronted] illogically places the 1986 events in the same time frame as Never before had...; a simple past tense is needed to present the 1986 events as following the earlier ones. Choices B and C awkwardly place at once between confronted and its direct object, changes. Furthermore, B illogically states that the Act itself was many changes, when the point is rather that it presented many changes, and as many ... that is an unidiomatic comparison. Choice E, too, presents an unidiomatic comparison with so many... that.

A 时态不对---根据句意

B 状语位置不对

C.状语位置不对, as many ..that 错,比较对象错

D

E so many..that错,从句逻辑混乱

168. Today, because of improvements in agricultural technology, the same amount of acreage produces double the apples that it has in 1910.

(A)  double the apples that it has

(B)  twice as many apples as it did

(C)  as much as twice the apples it has

(D)  two times as many apples as there were

(E)   a doubling of the apples that it did

Choice B, the best answer, correctly uses the adverbial phrase twice as many... to modify the verb produces; properly employs many rather than much to describe a quantity made up of countable units (apples); and appropriately substitutes did for the understood produced to express the logically necessary past tense of produces. Choice A awkwardly substitutes the adjective double for twice; uses that without a clear referent; and misuses has to refer to events occurring in 1910. Choice C employs the incorrect much in a wordy construction and also misuses has. D is wordy and imprecise;... as there were in 1910 refers to all apples produced in 1910, regardless of location. E is illogical: since that refers to a doubling, E nonsensically asserts that the doubling occurred in 1910.

好象都是用的从句.

诚请NN指点

39#
发表于 2005-3-18 07:38:00 | 只看该作者
要求NN表态。我顶!
40#
发表于 2005-3-18 07:49:00 | 只看该作者
我顶!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 04:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部