ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 599|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

NN们帮忙解读一下这段话?看不太懂哦。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-15 10:59:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Adam Smith:The Wealth of Nations (wiki background info)

  his oft quoted passage describes the unintentional consequences that come from individuals' pursuit their "own gain" and security. Smith argued people prefer local industry and are biased against international trade. Ideally, he saw economics as characterized by small local economies interacting with each other and guided by the enlightened self-interest of individuals. This was a reaction against the practices of early transnational corporations (for example: the British East India Company and Muscovy Company) which were mostly unresponsive to the local affairs of people and the stewardship of resources. Though the argument is frequently, and incorrectly, used to justify free-trade policies, The Wealth of Nations was a rebuttal to the scale and effects of chartered monopoly. By positing - now famously - that "self-interest" promotes more just societies, he was prescribing to economies already heavily tilted against individual human agency. For instance, American colonists were permitted to grow cotton but not to manufacture it. The cotton was shipped to England for processing, then purchased back as clothing. Smith felt opposing large multinational corporations (and the governments that support them), allowed individuals to direct industry "in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value." This value comes from the individual's self-interest and leads to an result that is "no part of his intention."
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 19:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部