鲜花村的写作贴

猫和鸭

10/17   TPO3 writing

The reading passage explores the issue of whether one painting is pained by Rembrandt or not. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the painting attribute to Rembrandt. which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
  First, even though the reading passage suggests that the elder wowan in the portrait dresses inconsistent,because of the cheap cap and luxurious fur collar. the professor argues in the lecture that the fur collar is not the part of the original painting.This is because the fur collar was painted on the original painting by someone for making the painting seems like the formal portrait of an aristocratic lady , which mean to increase the value of the painting.Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
  Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the light on the face of the portrait is not fit together with the dark fur collar which can absorb the light but reflect the light to the face,so states that the painting don’t attribute to Rembrandt since he would never have made such an error,but the professor contends that the painting is a work by Rembrandt. Because she supports this point with the fact that the light on the face is from the reflect of the original collar which is covered by fur collar.
  Finally, the professor asserts that Rembrandt never used the painting panel that made of several pieces of wood glued together,  The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that the glued panel is from the someone who glued it on the top and sides of the origianl painting for making the painting grander and valuer,and actually the original paining is painted on a single piece of wood panel which used the same wood panel on the other painting from the Rembrandt.
   In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading, the main point of the painting is could not be a work by Rembrandt is incorrect.

猫和鸭

10/18 TPO4


   The reading passage explores the issue of dinosaurs are endotherms. The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that dinosaurs are not endotherms, which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
  First, even though the reading passage suggests that dinosaur’s fossils were found in polar regions where only the endotherms can active in such cold area , the professor argues in the lecture that dinosaurs were also available to live in the polar regions at that time. This is because when dinosaurs lived, the polar regions were warm enough to support reptiles to live. Even in the period of cold months, they still can choose either migrating to the warm area or hibernating there.Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
  Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the position of dinosaur’s legs which underneath their bodies is the evidence that improve dinosaurs are endotherms,since the legs on this positons are better for running which is the endotherms’s primary characteristics. the professor contends that this idea can’t strongly improve that dinosaurs are endotherms. Then she supports this point with the fact that because of the large size of dinosaurs’s body and its rapidly growing, they have to get enough support power from their legs under the bodies.In other words, the mammals which have the legs under bodies are not necessarily endotherms.
　　　　   Finally, the professor arrests that the Haversian canals which the endotherms usually have were found in dinosaurs’s bodies can confirm the dinosaurs are endotherms. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that also the dinosaurs’s bodies surely have the Haversian canals which can prevent nerves and blood vessels to support the mammals to grow rapidly , but depend on the growth ring of dinosaurs,It seems their growth frequency which sometimes grow slowly,even stop in cold weather condition,and sometimes grow rapidly in warm weather condition is totally different with the endotherms’s which can grow even by keeping a constant body temperature year-around .
  In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading,dinosaurs are endotherms is incorrect.

AnthonySummer

10/17 TPO3 writing



The reading passage explores the issue of whether one painting is(was)painted by Rembrandt or not. The professor's lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that the painting attributes to Rembrandt. This contradicts with the reading states.（用which不能另起一句，否则就是疑问句）And the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.

First, even though the reading passage suggests that the elder woman in the portrait dresses inconsistent, because of the cheap cap and luxurious fur collar. The professor argues in the lecture that the fur collar is not the part of the original painting. This is because the fur collar was painted on the original painting by someone for making the painting seems like the formal portrait of an aristocratic lady, which（太多which从句了）means to increase the value of the painting. Obviously, the professor's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.

Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that the light on the face of the portrait is (was) not fit together with the dark fur collar which can absorb the light but reflect the light to the face, so states that the painting don't attribute to Rembrandt since he would never have made such an error, but the professor contends that the painting is（was） a work by Rembrandt. Because she supports this point with the fact that the light on the face is (was)from the reflection of the original collar which is covered by a fur collar.

Finally, the professor asserts that Rembrandt never used the painting panel that made of several pieces of wood glued together, The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that the glued panel is from the someone who glued it on the top and sides of the original painting for making the painting grander and valuer,and actually the original paining is（was） painted on a single piece of wood panel which used the same wood panel on the other painting from the Rembrandt.

In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading, the main point of the painting is could not be a work by Rembrandt is incorrect.（逻辑错误）

画是几百年前画好的，用过去时。一般过去式表示从过去发生一直持续到现在。某些地方我也不确定请多多指教。

听力不错，很多细节都听到了。

猫和鸭

10/19 TOP5 烦请狠批！

The reading passage explores the issue of how the Chaco houses were used,and states three theories to support this issue.The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, he raises doubt about three theories from the reading passage . And in the lecture, he claims another three different points for three theories.  
First, even though the reading passage suggests that Chaco great houses which each house can hold hundreds people are the perfect places to suitable live for such a large number of people, the professor argues in the lecture that it seems impossible. This is because the Chaco houses just have few fireplaces, which means the numbers of fireplaces can’t support such hundreds peoples who live together in Chaco houses. Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
  A second theory from the reading passage states that the Chaco houses were used for store main food-maize which can support people to live for a long time. But the professor contends that Chaco houses never used for store food.Then he supports this point with the fact that there has no any traces of maize or maize containers to be found.
  Finally, the professor asserts that the huge mount which near Chaco houses is not the strongly evidence to support Chaco houses were used for ceremonies, it is exactly the opposite of the third theory from the reading passage. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that the huge mount was just formed by some kinds of trashes,such as constructs trashes from the Chaco building, the meal cooking and container trashes from the constructors. In other word, these trashes were not those special stuffs for ceremonies.
  In conclusion, the professor clearly identifies the weaknesses in the reading passage about three theories,and convincingly shows that  each of arguments in the reading is indefensible.

猫和鸭

The reading passage explores the issue of disadvantages of communal online encyclopedias.The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue. However, she thinks that online encyclopedias have strong advantages , which contradicts what the reading states. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.
  First of all, the reading passage claims that online encyclopedias are not more professional than traditional encyclopedias. In contrast, the professor points out that actually we can’t find the totally perfect encyclopedias,whatever they’re on line or off line,and raise the problem that the mistakes from the encyclopedias have to be corrected.On this point,obviously,online encyclopedias are easy to corrected by the contributors, but for the traditional printed encyclopedias,they’re really hard to be corrected immediately. So the lecture totally disagrees with the view made in the reading passage.


Second, the passage demonstrates that the crucial articles from the online encyclopedias will be destroyed by some sabotages,such as the motions from vandals,hackers. In the lecture, the professor admits that on the online encyclopedias,some effectively protection ways have been implementing.including read-only format setting , editor-monitoring.Obviously, the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Finally, the passage raises the issue The professor opposes to the writer's expectation. She asserts that , content that explicitly(明确地) contradicts that passage.

10-22 TPO6
  Finally, the professor asserts that diversity of information is the strongest advantage of online encyclopedias. whereas the author of the reading claims that the resources from communal online encyclopedias are disorderly and no focus. The professor proves that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that diversity of informations is satisfy different users for their different needs,because of the plenty space to store more data than traditional printer encyclopedias’.
In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contracts with what is presented in the reading material.

猫和鸭

11/9  Spending money on traveling and vacation vs. Saving for future.

  Some people prefer to spending their money on traveling，others believe that they have to save money for their future life，As far as I am concerned，I agree that people should to spend money on traveling and vacation.My arguments for this point are listed as follows.    One of the primary causes is that traveling can form people’s disposition. Because going out for traveling can let you meet more new people and things that you never met before. So you can develop your social skill about how to communicate with the stranger and how to deal with the special issues. Like my roommate Rose who’s almost a kind of traveler.She spends whole of her short-term and long-term holiday on her traveling and vacation,as well as spends every penny on it.She said the traveling teach her lots of good skills for the futures job and life.like persistence in life and learn how to friendly easy of approach and faced the difficulty with courage which are the important skills in future life and job. So we can clearly see what spending money on traveling and vacation is worth!
 What is more，I think people who like to traveling will more health than the people who has a sedentary life on his or her working and studying everyday. Not only for the physical health, but also for the thinking health,some travels like walking,hiking, even swimming are the very excellent exercise,meanwhile, these travel places where have the wonderful views and perfect air condition will also improve our physical drives and good moods.so from this reason,spending money on traveling and vacation will get great reward in the future.
 Of course, I do not deny that saving money for the future has its own merits,but now days, for people who get the big pressure on their job and study have to spend time to take a break for their bodies and minds . Otherwise,though they are possessed of great wealth or get enough accomplishments,it will pale without the guarantee of health.
   In summary, depending on those discussion above,I firmly support that people should spend money on the traveling and vacation.