gwd-8-22

杀出血路

old oil painting 和 old oil paint之间存在gap，答案就是如何弥补这个gap，应该是D。

lucy67

一针见血！茅塞顿开。谢谢谢

michellechang

以下是引用foucsfei在2005-6-19 12:37:00的发言：

请问: C 为何不对.

如果没有其他物品受温度 . 适度影响 。当然可以relax their standard.

Thx

我做的时候也选c，觉得明显是正确答案，没看DE，心里还嘲笑og上说一定要看完全部选项再选择。

我觉得如果题目是Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil painting is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity.

那么应该D

dreamerps

B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.

请问B取非是反对前提而没反对结论吗？所以就不对？

原文说even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity.

leonchan

以下是引用mindfree在2004-8-23 20:02:00的发言：

Answer is D.

B does not have to be true for this question. If the painting deteriorate somewhat with the standards, the standards can still be relaxed if the relaxation does not affect the restoration. I do not know why you choose B. Pls explain.

C is not correct either. It is clearly out of scope. We are talking about restoring this particular type of painting and the standards as well as the change are both for this kind of painting. Whether the museum has other kind of items is irrelevent. Please make sure you understand.

D is one typical answer. It simply points out that it might not be the oil that requires the standard, but something else.

mindfree不是说了么，B的条件太强；即使有一点影响还是可以接受的，因为这不是省钱么（按原文的逻辑 very costly）

LOR:因为实验发现old paint不会受温度湿度影响，所以relax  the standard 不会影响old painting。问假设。
因此，C中的items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings. 无关

D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...
取非 = SOME of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...

既然油画上的paint不会受温度湿度影响（因为实验证明old paint如何如何），而且D说其他冬冬也不会受影响而破坏油画，这不就全了么。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-10-12 0:27:48编辑过]

evonneangela

以下是引用dreamerps在2005-10-7 20:59:00的发言：

B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.

请问B取非是反对前提而没反对结论吗？所以就不对？

原文说even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity.

我觉得是对B取非后,可能存在两种情况,就是究竟是将现有的标准提高好,还是降低好,即对结论的削弱作用不明确.我一开始也选的b,就是默认为取非后现在的标准会造成油画损害,那么就该采取更严格的标准.实际上文中没有提到.不知道说得你能不能理解.呵呵

追逐梦想2006

栽了！

Paint和painting原来是不同的意思，一个是颜料，一个是油画

真鬼，这道题目！

lexie

yep, I got caught due to the same reason.

Painting and pain are definitely two concepts:

paint:a liquid that you put on a surface, using a brush to make the surface a particular colour

painting:a painted picture that you put on a wall for people to see

We gotta fill the gap between "painting" and "paint" with sth., such as choice "D".

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-7 22:04:05编辑过]

brucejohnson

严重同意追逐梦想。一开始不会做，弄明白painting是指画，paint是指颜料后就恍然大悟，当然选D。

zimerman

under the current standards 已经限定范围，可以以无关排除