ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: paopao
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-8-22

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-22 09:20:00 | 只看该作者

leeon, 再读这题 如果


B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil
paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.


改为


B. Under the standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil
paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.


对不对


我认为还是不对


B有两个错误


1under current standard


2. deteriorate 并没有限制是题干中的wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity


如果其它原因 就out of scope


不知我理解得对不对


谢谢

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-22 09:27:00 | 只看该作者

如果我的理解是对的话 在实际考试中如何才能避免这样的错误呢


这种选项好鬼

13#
发表于 2004-10-22 09:32:00 | 只看该作者
I think u have understood this question. The choice u have changed is still not correct. For it does not focus on the reasoning of the paragraph, currents standard or any other standards can not damage the conclusion of this argument.
14#
发表于 2004-10-22 09:35:00 | 只看该作者
I think the conclusion is the most important in doing assumtion questions. Usually we forget the conclusion after we read the choice. So if we confused by one choice, we can look back to take a look at the conclusion, then compares the choice to the conclusion. I think that will help us to rule out irrelevant choices. Anyway, we should practice more.
15#
发表于 2004-11-30 10:42:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-8-22

GWD-8-Q22*:
When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined within narrow margins. Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current standards.
B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
C. Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings.

D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.

E. Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the regions where the paintings were created.[D]
I choose B  instead, when i use negate of B , the conclusion is unhold.
So what is wrong with B?
Thanks.


mindfree ,. leeon, thank you for your response.
I will list the follwing reason
evidence: 1Maintaining this environment is very costly
2.even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity
conclusion:museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings
i negate B, that is  Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do deteriorate at all.
from the above sentence , those paintings are endangered , of course.
so i think b is also assumption. and the conslusion is unhold.
of course, D is also assumption.
I was totally confused , even if i use negation to rest in b and d. and both seem ok.

否定B--Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings do deteriorate at all, 原文的结论(museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings)并没有被否定.

因为: 虽然可以得出museums could relax their standards and save money, 但是, 同时也endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.


16#
发表于 2005-2-16 12:27:00 | 只看该作者

好不容易明白了为什么B是IRRELEVENT,但是想问问,D答案:“None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to
cause damage to the paintings.”究竟是什么意思,是说除了复兴画的涂料本身,其他复兴时期的画油画原材料是不那么容易被改变温度和湿度来引起损坏???是这个意思吗?那这样的话,这怎么会是ASSUMPTION呢?我觉得是WEAKEN结论MUSEUMS RELAX STANDARDS的呀!!!请帮忙解释一下!!!谢谢!!!

17#
发表于 2005-2-17 14:13:00 | 只看该作者
帮帮忙呀!!不明白!!!!!
18#
发表于 2005-5-25 20:18:00 | 只看该作者

除了复兴画的涂料本身,其他复兴时期的画油画原材料是不那么容易被改变温度和湿度来引起损坏???是这个意思吗?那这样的话,这怎么会是ASSUMPTION呢?我觉得是WEAKEN结论MUSEUMS RELAX STANDARDS的呀!!!请帮忙解释一下!!!谢谢!!!


MM,这个negate一下比较好理解:除了涂料以外,油画上有些其他材料容易被温度和湿度改变,这个改变足以导致对油画的破坏。这样就否定原结论喽

19#
发表于 2005-5-25 20:22:00 | 只看该作者
关于B,我觉得根本不能从原文infer出来;mindfree说得很好,这个问题时一个相对的比较,不要拿到绝对环境中。
20#
发表于 2005-6-19 12:37:00 | 只看该作者

请问: C 为何不对.


如果没有其他物品受温度 . 适度影响 。当然可以relax their standard.


Thx

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-26 09:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部