ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lawyer_1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【实战方法】GMAT逻辑解题方法 by lawyer

[精华]   [复制链接]
111#
发表于 2006-3-11 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
112#
发表于 2006-3-18 11:58:00 | 只看该作者


104.
Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8
percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend
evident since 1981 – when outlays for research and development increased 16.4
percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by
Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and
development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.







The
conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following
is true?



(A)
Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional
to business profits.



(B)
Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by
more than 8.3%.



(C)
Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for
research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.



(D) In
the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and
development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was. D



(E)
Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing
businesses to make those investments.

Lawyer,过来帮忙一下。这个题目D可以理解,用denial test可以得出

这个是条件型结论吧?用你的思路怎么解?

谢谢



113#
发表于 2006-4-9 02:46:00 | 只看该作者
I love CD! I love you all!
114#
发表于 2006-4-12 22:53:00 | 只看该作者

LAWYER ,厉害厉害的

115#
发表于 2006-4-20 12:09:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢分享!

Let's Fight,
Demon Hunter

116#
发表于 2006-4-22 17:45:00 | 只看该作者
又看了一遍!发现要多做点题才能看出感觉!
117#
发表于 2006-4-23 13:03:00 | 只看该作者
非常感激感谢,不知你现在有没有时间回复贴子.
118#
发表于 2006-4-29 00:15:00 | 只看该作者
不顶不像话!!!
119#
发表于 2006-4-29 22:25:00 | 只看该作者

不懂不懂:


14PRINCIPLE


看问题:原则在原文还是选项



看原文:如果原则在原文,找出原则的条件。如果原则在选项,找出结论和推出结论的直接前提。



找答案:对于原则在原文的,将条件和选项直接比,符合条件的为答案。对于原则在选项的将推出结论的前提和结论和选项比,看是否在选项原则之内。


恳请举例说明:OG-24 or OG-98 or OG-106

120#
发表于 2006-5-7 11:44:00 | 只看该作者

看了一遍,基本没啥感觉,太深奥了,还得好好研究


如果能有吃透了的牛人来个每一句话放个例题在旁边,估计就容易多了。


强烈呼唤此牛人!!!!


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-7 11:45:09编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 14:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部