这道题比较搞。大全-3-20

blur

test3-20 The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.

(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known

(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

有点摸不着头脑，还请各位指点。

leeon

I think it's not easy to understand.

"当被提名者多于一个人的时候，被提名者必须接受任命，在接受任命之前，被提名者必须被告知其他的提名者是谁。

题干中的条件句说直到被提名者接受被提名之后才能知道实际的提名者是哪些人。"

According to the above information, u can get the answer E.