gwd-12-11

MinyiSu888

that the current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded,请问是什么意思啊？

maomm

re

SuccessMBA08

好题，lawyer分析的也太好了！终于明白了！

carriexu

~~

akiluk

的观点和Mindfree一致，呵呵！因为题目原文明确指出：students/teachers 的比率不能超出，
又断言未来老师的工作机会不会减少，则：如要满足断言中分母未来t >=目前数量的话，s /t 是正比例关系，则只有分子S 未来的数量>=目前数量。带着这个思路寻找答案，只有B满足：S的数量未来可能增加；即使这些私立学校的学生不去公立学校，原来的s/t不变即可，教师就维持原状，也不会失业（符合原文 not reduce jobs的断言）；
A：s /t现在的比率比过去高，对将来s是否增加无法作出判断，无关；
C：现在t的数量比过去高，对将来s是否增加无法作出判断，无关；
D：无关；
E：可能削弱；过去经济衰退会关闭学校，可能会减少教师职位，教师失业；


****************
我就是被上面最后1个条件给绕进去了,选了A,
最后说 students/teachers比例不能超出,我设这个比例是100,"不能超出"就是不能大于100啦.所以就往反方向去找了.......


关键看怎么理解这个exceeded了.....

-- by 会员 sch (2007/10/23 10:21:00)

题目是current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.意思是被超出喔~  不是超出~大家小心！

jaze

 B



MY opinion：



In the passage, the conclusion needed support is that "any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools". The reason for it is:



1. Government-funded schools free of charge --- money issue;



2. Current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded --- students and teachers' number issue, R=S/T must be kept unchanged.



In the light of the reasons, B exactly related the money issue and the number issue, by indicating that in time of recession, 25% of V children would go to public school because of money issue, and that this fact will lead to the flutuation of R=S/T.  When S increases, the government will increase T in order to keep R in balance.  







D, maybe it mentions the current situation of R=S/T, however, it's not related to "reason 1- free of charge, the moey issue".  What's more, the current ratio of S and T can't garantee anything in the future when there is a recession.

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-19 10:40:51编辑过]

-- by 会员 jasmine113 (2008/6/19 10:40:00)

well done

lala974

我来考古，谢谢lawyer大神