支持b看我下面hightlight的地方和e都有对应.而且文章并没有说除woody外其他人没有研究过revolution以前的东东啊,所以b应该是文章未提到的.相反,文章说了再k前没人提女人,而w是个例外
Introduction of the republican moth-
erhood thesis dramatically changed
historiography.  rior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians barely mentioned
women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception. Examining
newspaper advertisements for acade-
mies, Woody found that educational
opportunities increased for both girls
and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An
(30) Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting
a shift in view, Woody also claimed that
practical education for females had
many advocates before the Revolution.
Woody’s evidence challenges the notion
(35) that the Revolution changed attitudes
regarding female education, although it
may have accelerated earlier trends.
Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-
lican motherhood” thesis may have
(40) obscured the presence of these trends,
making it difficult to determine to what
extent the Revolution really changed
women’s lives.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q10:
According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was
- innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence
- exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution
- unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices
- controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys
- atypical in that it examined the education of girls
|