ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ztlbox
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]gwd7-10

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-10-4 19:45:00 | 只看该作者

我选的是E.但是现在看来还是B比较好..因为文章的提问是:According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was........然而从文中就可以得出来.有很多work是研究  妇女的.....Prior to Kerber’s work,educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929  其中kerber's work 就是研究妇女的..所以E是错的.

12#
发表于 2005-10-10 17:59:00 | 只看该作者

10:.理由如携隐所说,关键注意题目、原文、选项三者之间的对应关系:

According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was ?

Prior to Kerber’s work,
educational historians
barely mentioned
women and girls
; Thomas Woody’s 1929
(25) work is the notable exception.

E. atypical in that it examined the education of girls

13#
发表于 2005-11-23 20:44:00 | 只看该作者

支持b看我下面hightlight的地方和e都有对应.而且文章并没有说除woody外其他人没有研究过revolution以前的东东啊,所以b应该是文章未提到的.相反,文章说了再k前没人提女人,而w是个例外


Introduction of the republican moth-


       erhood thesis dramatically changed


       historiography.  rior to Kerber’s work,


educational historians barely mentioned


women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929


(25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining


newspaper advertisements for acade-


mies, Woody found that educational


opportunities increased for both girls


and boys around 1750.  ointing to “An


(30)      Essay on Woman” (1753) as reflecting


a shift in view, Woody also claimed that


practical education for females had


       many advocates before the Revolution.


Woody’s evidence challenges the notion


(35)    that the Revolution changed attitudes


regarding female education, although it


may have accelerated earlier trends.


Historians’ reliance on Kerber’s “repub-


      lican motherhood” thesis may have


(40)     obscured the presence of these trends,


making it difficult to determine to what


extent the Revolution really changed


women’s lives.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q10:


According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was


              



  • innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence

  • exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution

  • unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices

  • controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys

  • atypical in that it examined the education of girls
  • 14#
    发表于 2005-12-1 08:51:00 | 只看该作者

    从你的分析看更应该选E啊,对吗?

    15#
    发表于 2005-12-16 17:46:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用ankeke在2004-12-19 16:40:00的发言:
    我也选的E 但后来我感觉B是对的:E中的ATYPICAL 这个词在文中没有对应,而且它略带贬义,文中Thomas Woody’s 1929 work is the notable exception.  Examining 。。。。around 1750即说明了EXCEPTIONAL 又说明是CONCENTRATED ON THE PERIOD BEFORE THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION 不知道这样想对不对

    atypical这个此好象应该是中性词吧,查了几大英英词典都没说到带贬义色彩,估计是中文词典里翻译的时候给人这种感觉,所以这个应该不是问题。

    只是,E的话也太没深度了,前面那句就能找到定位,而且E如果加上“考虑了独立战争前”这样一个限制的话,才应该比较好。B么是少了独立战争前“女性”。

    虽然第一次做的时候选了E

    16#
    发表于 2006-4-19 05:56:00 | 只看该作者

    B exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution.



    Since it is concentrated on the period before the american revolution, it is exceptional. It's ridiculous, for there are many researches concentrated on the period before

    17#
    发表于 2006-8-16 18:25:00 | 只看该作者
    E 绝对是正常思维选出来的答案,ETS变态,纯粹玩文字游戏
    18#
    发表于 2006-8-16 21:23:00 | 只看该作者

    汗..这么多人已经下乐结论..不怎么敢发表意见乐..

    但是大家看第二段的结构..

    在下exception的结论后有两句话:

    Examining newspaper advertisements for academies,..

    Pointing to "An Essay on Woman", Woody also claimed that practical education for females had many advocates before the Revolution.他的这个观点是挑战了传统观点的,也就是针对Revolution前的状况提出了不同的意见

    also表示Examining和Pointing都是为了说明exception这一结论..

    再看Examining句,看看Woody同学Examine的究竟是什么..是newspaper advertisements,然后从这些资料里得出的关于女子教育的结论..

    E选项中写,examine education,这个似乎就有点问题了吧..所以E是不对滴,同时B就看上去比较亲切可爱了..

    LZ同学提到的精确呼应是这样的两句话rior to Kerber's work, educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Woody's work is the notable exception.也就是说,Woody的exception在于his work mentioned women and girls,再看E选项,atypical in that it examined the education of girls..太深刻了吧..

    B选项针对的是可能被大家忽视的Pointing to..

    现在还认为E对的同学请站出来..大家讨论讨论嘛..


    [此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-16 21:26:17编辑过]
    19#
    发表于 2006-9-5 13:43:00 | 只看该作者

     Prior to Kerber’s work,

    educational historians barely mentioned

    women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929

    (25)      work is the notable exception. 

    两句话中间用了分号,表示逻辑关系紧密

    前据说,在K 之前,教育的学者很少提及妇女和女孩。

    TW 1929 的 work 是一个显著的例外。

    显然两句逻辑关系上是紧密相连的,就是下句的例外只得是和上句的区别

    取非后 得出E

    accordingly 事实作用题 ,直接从文章出现处定位就可以读出了

    如果是推断体,按照OG的说法要多看几句。

    因此 E  an notalbe and wise choice

    20#
    发表于 2006-12-18 05:38:00 | 只看该作者
    B: other historians may also concentrated on the period before the American Revolution. According to paragraph, they barely study female education.
    E: best choice. L25-26.
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 03:53
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部