ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In the late 1980s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2491|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【求助】prep 07 cr1 22题~~!!谢谢各位!感激不尽!!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-7 03:30:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
22.    (28829-!-item-!-188;#058&003748)

In the late 1980s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific began to decline.  There are two plausible explanations for the decline:  predation, possibly by killer whales, or disease.  Of these two, disease is the more likely, since a concurrent sharp decline in populations of seals and sea lions is believed to have been caused by disease, and diseases that infect these creatures are likely to be able to infect sea otters also.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

(A) Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
(B) There is no indication that the sea otter population at any North Pacific location declined in the 1980s because of substantial numbers of sea otters migrating to other locations.
(C) Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
(D) Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.
(E) The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.

A选项为正确答案,但是,kill whale没有seals 和sea lion吃了,并没有说一定会去吃sea otters啊 ?这算是我们主观加的条件吗?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-7-7 15:45:30 | 只看该作者
我觉得在这个题干中用的是类比法,作者说因为seals and sea lions的下降是由disease引起的,从而推断sea otter的下降也是由于disease引起的。但是如果seal and sea lions的下降不是由于disease引起的呢,而是由于whales引起的,是A选项里说的,那么,我们同样用类比的方法推断,sea otter的下降是由于whale引起的,从而削弱了结论。
板凳
发表于 2012-7-7 16:29:34 | 只看该作者
先看题,是weaken类型,所以先找结论,再看前提。
结论1:Seal和lion decline;前提:disease (而且是believed,也就是事实)
结论2:Otter decline;可能前提:(a)被whale kill(b)disease

看答案:
(A)Seal和lion下降-->whale没有吃的了-->吃Otter,所以证明了可能前题(a)
(B)由于移居-->Otter少了(no indication);跟原文中可能前提无关,排除
(C)1980年Otter与之前时代比少了;与1980年代内otter为什么decline无关;排除
(D)Otter decline --->另一物种增多了;没有说明为什么otter decline,只是另一个递进的因果;排除
(E)seal和lion比otter分布广,不是前提,与otter decline无关;排除
地板
发表于 2012-7-9 00:26:27 | 只看该作者
我想问C选项为什么不算是给出他因
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-10 08:17:50 | 只看该作者
谢谢一楼和二楼的大大·~~明白了不少!!~~~~~
6#
发表于 2012-7-10 22:37:04 | 只看该作者
一个说的是1980s之外的事情,一个说的是1980s之内的事。何来他因呢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 15:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部