- UID
- 751086
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-4-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
参与讨论: 选E
P1: ED fossils have impairment P2: Maya used the trap that struck the forehead of the prey conclusion: The fossils must be those of Maya's prey
Ask : Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument above?
A. Some of ancient Elaphurus davidianus do have innate impairment on forehead. [some 不能代表全部] B. The acid rain in Guatemala did not make additional damage on the fossils of ancient Elaphurus davidianus. 【微弱加强】 C. A great many Maya hunters, who frequently used the trap, lived in Guatemala. 【irrelevant】 D. Even if the ancient deer was struck by the trap, there would have been no treatment for it available in the period it lived. 【irrelevant】 E. The trap Maya used could not impair the preys to the extent comparable to that of archaeologist’s discovery 【weaken】 |
|