| 
 
UID631444在线时间 小时注册时间2011-5-13最后登录1970-1-1主题帖子性别保密 
 | 
| 但有些细节题和意图关系不大,该用什么思路做题呢? 譬如:
 
 Two modes of argumentation have been used on
 behalf of women’s emancipation in Western societies.
 Arguments in what could be called the “relational”
 feminist tradition maintain the doctrine of “equality in
 (5) difference,” or equity as distinct for equality. They
 posit that biological distinctions between the sexes
 result in a necessary sexual division of labor in the
 family and throughout society and that women’s pro-
 creative labor is currently undervalued by society, to
 (10) the disadvantage of women. By contrast, the individual-
 ist feminist tradition emphasizes individual human rights
 and celebrates women’s quest for personal autonomy,
 while downplaying the importance of gender roles and
 minimizing discussion of childbearing and its attendant
 (15) responsibilities.
 Before the late nineteenth century, these views
 coexisted within the feminist movement, often within
 the writings of the same individual. Between 1890 nd
 1920, however, relational feminism, which had been the
 (20) dominant strain in feminist thought, and which still pre-
 dominates among European and non-Western feminists,
 lost ground in England and the United States. Because
 the concept of individual rights was already well estab-
 lished in the Anglo-Saxon legal and political tradition,
 (25) individualist feminism came to predominate in English-
 speaking countries. At the same time, the goals of the
 two approaches began to seem increasingly irreconcil-
 able. Individualist feminists began to advocate a totally
 gender-blind system with equal rights for all. Relational
 (30) feminists, while agreeing that equal educational and
 economic opportunities outside the home should be avail-
 able for all women, continued to emphasize women’s
 special contributions to society as homemakers and
 mothers; they demanded special treatment
 (35) including protective legislation for women workers,
 state-sponsored maternity benefits, and paid compensa-
 tion for housework.
 
 Relational arguments have a major pitfall: because
 they underline women’s physiological and psychological
 (40) distinctiveness, they are often appropriated by political
 adversaries and used to endorse male privilege. But the
 individualist approach, by attacking gender roles, deny-
 ing the significance of physiological difference, and
 condemning existing familial institutions as hopelessly
 (45) patriarchal, has often simply treated as irrelevant the
 family roles important to many women. If the individu-
 alist framework, with its claim for women’s autonomy,
 could be harmonized with the family-oriented concerns
 of relational feminists, a more fruitful model for con-
 (50) temporary feminist politics could emerge.
 
 
 126. The passage suggests that the author of the passage
 believes which of the following?
 (A) The predominance of individualist feminism in
 English-speaking countries is a historical
 phenomenon, the causes of which have not yet
 been investigated.
 (B) The individualist and relational feminist views are
 irreconcilable, given their theoretical differences
 concerning the foundations of society.
 (C) A consensus concerning the direction of future
 feminist politics will probably soon emerge, given
 the awareness among feminists of the need for
 cooperation among women.
 (D) Political adversaries of feminism often misuse
 arguments predicated on differences between the
 sexes to argue that the existing social system
 should be maintained.
 (E) Relational feminism provides the best theoretical
 framework for contemporary feminist politics, but
 individualist feminism could contribute much
 toward refining and strengthening modern feminist
 thought.
 | 
 |