[讨论]八月八号厦门gmat学习小组成立了！

pony

JOY给我一份好吗？thanx
我的E-MAIL：ponyhome1978(A) hotmail.com

tocean0222

以下是引用joywzy在2003-7-17 23:21:00的发言：
tocean, may i join in your program to list the topics of AI?

joy,
ok,pls collect the topics of argument appeared in JJ from April to July, and remember to note how many times each topic has been appeared.Send the list to me before monday.no problem?

albert,
you also can list the topics of issue and send it to me for confirmation.and then i will make a list of topics according to their probability of appearence.

thanks

email:

joywzy

以下是引用tocean0222在2003-7-18 1:02:00的发言：
joy,
ok,pls collect the topics of argument appeared in JJ from April to July, and remember to note how many times each topic has been appeared.Send the list to me before monday.no problem?

tocean, i am sorry . These days, I am working busy so that i might not have enough time to finish the  task you mentioned . I am sorry to say that . Could you pls help me collect AWA jj from April to July?After that , pls send me a copy? OK?

BTW, i will finish the summary of SC as soon as possile in my spare time.

Sorry.

albert

以下是引用joywzy在2003-7-17 16:18:00的发言：
mike, 过两天,整理好了,给你发一份.

albert, CXD的假设,有几题不清,能帮我看看吗?

T50 D?

T52 C?

T72 C?

谢谢.

I almost finished the answer,but the brower close automatically...sad...I have to retype again...
T50
because genetic susceptibility will be counteract, the illness will disappear...

there is a gap between genetic susceptibi8lity and illness...
D is not necessary condtion because even though some humans are NOT susceptible to some disease, the conclusion still holds...we should focus on the relation between susceptibility and illness, but NOT human and disease...

T52.

from the passage we know that  flying time is a required fator to the  safety of airline, but not sufficient condition...In another word, lack of flying time will lead to the crash of airline, however, enough flying time will not certainly give rise to the decrease of airline crash...maybe several factors together with flying time determine the safty of airline...So CHOICE C is a sufficient condition but not an required condition...
This is a common trick in GMAT CR...think twice...we should notice that differece of sufficient condition and required condition to identify the assumption correctly

T72
a quite long passage...we should dig out some useful information to make a clear picture of this argument

evidence:
1. peer review is required condtion to protect public health
2. medical publication will occur after the peer review
coclusion:
to protect publice health, we should wait for the medical publicaiton...

from the information above, we notice a GAP..
we noly need the peer review, but we should wait for the publication...
assumption: publicaiton is an required condition of the peer review..in another word, without publication, peer review will not occur, as A says.

C.. from the line of reasoning above, we should know know that the access of public to the medical journals is irrlevant to this argument...
we should focus two key words: peer review and publication ...C is easy to eliminate if we notice that it is talking about another key words...access of public

good luck!

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-18 10:33:01编辑过]

albert

以下是引用tocean0222在2003-7-18 1:02:00的发言：
joy,
ok,pls collect the topics of argument appeared in JJ from April to July, and remember to note how many times each topic has been appeared.Send the list to me before monday.no problem?

albert,
you also can list the topics of issue and send it to me for confirmation.and then i will make a list of topics according to their probability of appearence.

thanks

email:

tocean0222, the task seem to be a big problem to me now because I will take the test in 10 days...maybe I have not enough time to do all of the tasks...I prefer to summarize the JJ in july...hope to share some of your burden...

anybody can give more help?

greenfish

以下是引用albert在2003-7-17 8:09:00的发言：
but greenfish, I don't know how is your study going on...But as I know, you will take the test soon, so I would recommend that you not take too much time on such pure logic questions in LSAT...because such questions won't occur in the GMAT test...such pure logic questions will take you a lot of time and you can't get anything useful to crack the GMAT...
good luck!

再次谢谢ALBERT的解答，也谢谢你提醒我复习方向！但我逻辑确实不过关，或者说现在要以GMAT的逻辑为主？还有，是不是考试时如果时间紧张的话，可以放弃一篇阅读？我的目标是700。

greenfish

TOCEAN，JOY，可以给我发一份吗?谢谢！ greenfishwu@21cn.com

mike1999

这两天摆弄电脑整个人都烦死了,好象没有复习状态了.现在基本上可以重新开始了.可是由于计划被打乱,资料又不能失而复得,我现在有点不知道从何下手了.还有20天就考试了.唉.我应该早点振作精神了.

greenfish

MIKE，不要着急。有没有什么我可以帮得上忙的，别客气！

mike1999

以下是引用greenfish在2003-7-18 16:57:00的发言：
MIKE，不要着急。有没有什么我可以帮得上忙的，别客气！

暂时也没有吧,还好我总结的GMAT逻辑发给JOY了,还有那两部分LSAT逻辑.JOY都又重新给我了,总算挽回点损失.其他大概就是一些语法总结,数学的错题目录,作文的一些纲要,好象也就没什么了.损失不大,我的电脑已经搞定了,资料也重新下好了,剩下的就是调整心态,准备冲刺了.还有,LSAT总结的工作我是做不下去了,那些资料都没了,再弄一次太费时间,你结合自己的情况进行复习吧.

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-7-18 17:14:41编辑过]