- UID
- 764874
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-5-29
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
速度先贴上来吧~~ 2’35 The excerpt of the paper: an research on how virus make effects between mammals. The problem not is not about the virus itself but about how it mutate to form and how it be dangerous for human.(in the future)
2’22 Two experiments both want to find how virus mutates to become survived in the air and wether it is well enough to be dangerous for human. The reason to publish the paper even without real practical findings is to increase the chance to solve the problem in the future.
2’00 The reason why NASSBB questioned the publishing of the paper? The use of science will have possibilities of both good and evil: for protection and for terrorists’ attacking. The use of NASSB is to act as a judge, to give effective direction.
2’40 How do we define the good or bad outcomes? The best method we can imagine is to depend on NSABB, which will give a fair judgment instead of letting government to interfere (who always underestimate the benefits and underestimates the dangers)
2’30 What eventually made NSABB reversal decision? No in-person contact at first place; the infection effect is less that NSABB had thought; some date was misinterpreted and there exists some misconcepts. |
|