- UID
- 600097
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-1-24
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
我终于知道这题答案B为什么要用argue了! 原文: Yet it can be argued that through contracts negotiated and enforced by White union members, unions—CIO unions not excluded—were often instrumental in maintaining the occupational segregation and other forms of racial discrimination that kept African Americans socially and economically oppressed during this period. However, recognizing employers’ power over workers as a central factor in African Americans’ economic marginalization, African American workers saw the need to join with White workers in seeking change despite White unionists’ toleration of or support for racial discrimination.
这段话做题的时候觉得特别特别别扭,不懂第一个yet哪儿来的转折,现在反复看这道主旨题终于明白为什么这里用yet,而答案要选argue了~ 我一开始也觉得文章只是在娓娓道来黑人运动是如何千回百转最后成功的,但是这句话体现出了作者不是没有目的性倾向性的,而是通过这一系列的史实来构建自己的argument,从而驳斥这种别人可能提出的argument。 |
|