ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2147|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep08-82

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-10 15:16:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Technologicalimprovements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energydirectly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade.  However, the threshold of economic viabilityfor solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to risein order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-firedpower plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Whichof the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increasedcost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economicviability?

A.The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
B.The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despiteincreased raw material costs for that equipment.
C.Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
D.Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired,power plants.
E.When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worthexploiting become economically viable.


答案c,题干括号内的内容有点不理解,求高人指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-11 22:00:38 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-13 14:45:58 | 只看该作者
up
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-14 23:06:23 | 只看该作者
up
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-15 19:14:50 | 只看该作者
up
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-17 23:02:42 | 只看该作者
up
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-3 11:07:47 | 只看该作者
up
8#
发表于 2012-7-3 12:03:43 | 只看该作者
解决矛盾题
DISCREPANCY: S-P的cost-ef 上升,但是S-P的viability threshold不变
这里的关键理解处在于viability,而stimuli中也特意括号中解释了,(oil的price would have to rise使得SP更加经济),也就是说,如果按照常理说:油价上升,sp的viability应该上升。
这样的话逻辑链就很顺了。如以下:
                                           SOLAR POWER              OIL
cost-Ef                                    上升                            不晓得-----》应该是上升了
price                                        较低                            更高
VIABILITY(考虑以上两因素)     不变 (unchanged)  不变
9#
发表于 2012-7-3 12:04:36 | 只看该作者
不晓得能看懂不。有可能有漏洞,大题思路应该是这样。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 08:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部