- UID
- 548393
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
8#

楼主 |
发表于 2012-6-5 23:58:21
|
只看该作者
应该是这篇,从上个月的jj里扒出来的。委屈你先在这里看一下吧。楼主在上班,晚上下班更新。 The following appeared in an article in thehealth section of a newspaper. “There is a common misconception that university hospitals are better thancommunity or private hospitals. This notion is unfounded, however: theuniversity hospitals in our region employ 15 percent fewer doctors, have a 20percent lower success rate in treating patients, make far less overall profit,and pay their medical staff considerably less than do private hospitals.Furthermore, many doctors at university hospitals typically divide their timeamong teaching, conducting research, and treating patients. From this it seemsclear that the quality of care at university hospitals is lower than that atother kinds of hospitals
| 报纸的健康板块上的文章: 有一种普遍的错误观念认为大学医院比社区或私人医院更好。这个想法是无根据的,我们地区的大学医院较之私人医院,少雇15%的医生,对患者的治愈率要低20%,总体利润要小得多,给一户员工的待遇比私人医院低很多。而且,很多大学医院的医生将他们的时间分为教学,直到研究和看病几部分。从此可明显看出大学医院的服务质量比其他医院低。 [tr] [td=568] 参考思路: [/td] [/tr] [tr] [td=568] 1. 从一个医院的情况就推广到整个太草率 [/td] 2. 治愈率低可能是因为接受的患者得的病都比较罕见等原因造成的 [/tr] 3. 工资低,总体利润低,时间分配给教学都不能一定说明质量差。可能其他福利好,接受的病人少,教学研究有助于进步 [tr] [td=568] 七宗罪思路: [/td] [/tr] [tr] [td=568] 1. 证据不足:不能说明一个医院的情况适用于整个医院 [/td] 2. 因果关系:治愈率低不能说明质量差 [/tr] 3. 错误假设 |
|