各位大侠，求助啊！OG 12版第22篇，120-127题

kuyie221

       这篇阅读GWD也有，OG 12有，OG 13也有，讲电话线路的现代化问题的，整个OG阅读只有这篇是看不懂的，真心觉得water right的那篇法律文章都比这篇好懂。  想知道原文讲的是什么东西，看得一头雾水，做OG 12的时候看不懂，做OG 13还是看不懂，做错的题还是错，而且2次居然选的都是不一样的错误选项，晕。 求各位大侠指教，无尽感谢！

Jon Clark’s study of the effect of
the modernization of a telephone
exchange on exchange maintenance
work and workers is a solid contribution
(5) to a debate that encompasses two
lively issues in the history and sociol16
ogy of technology: technological
determinism and social constructivism.
Clark makes the point that the char-
(10) acteristics of a technology have a
decisive influence on job skills and
work organization. Put more strongly,
technology can be a primary determinant
of social and managerial organ-
(15) ization. Clark believes this possibility
has been obscured by the recent sociological
fashion, exemplified by
Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes
the way machinery reflects social
(20) choices. For Braverman, the shape of
a technological system is subordinate
to the manager’s desire to wrest control
of the labor process from the
workers. Technological change is
(25) construed as the outcome of negotiations
among interested parties who
seek to incorporate their own interests
into the design and configuration of the
machinery. This position represents
(30) the new mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance
by misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are
(35) supposed to believe, for example, that
machinery imposes appropriate forms
of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to
view technology as existing outside
(40) society, capable of directly influencing
skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the
constructivists by both theoretical and
empirical arguments. Theoretically he
(45) defines “technology” in terms of relationships
between social and technical
variables. Attempts to reduce the
meaning of technology to cold, hard
metal are bound to fail, for machinery
(50) is just scrap unless it is organized
functionally and supported by appropriate
systems of operation and main17
tenance. At the empirical level Clark
shows how a change at the telephone
(55) exchange from maintenance-intensive
electromechanical switches to semielectronic
switching systems altered
work tasks, skills, training opportunities,
administration, and organization of
(60) workers. Some changes Clark attributes
to the particular way management
and labor unions negotiated the introduction
of the technology, whereas
others are seen as arising from the
(65) capabilities and nature of the technology
itself. Thus Clark helps answer
the question: “When is social choice
decisive and when are the concrete
characteristics of technology more
important?”

jinybaobao

我也觉得这篇最难了，希望高手指点，谢谢！

jinybaobao

刚才再沉下心读了一遍，思路清晰了许多。建议做个笔记，每读完一段都仔细想想本段大意义及在全文中的逻辑地位。

miffyhui

The constructivists gain acceptance
by misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are
(35) supposed to believe, for example, that
machinery imposes appropriate forms
of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to
view technology as existing outside
(40) society, capable of directly influencing
skills and work organization.

这一段没看懂，提到机械是个怎么一回事？前面说机械，后面一句又说技术？这是什么关系？然后到C那里反驳的时候又说机械离不开技术。这几句的逻辑关系连不起来。求NN解答！

miffyhui

up up up

miffyhui

up up up，最近没有大牛答疑了吗？ 求解答！

miffyhui

up

miffyhui

miffyhui

继续up......