ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ztlbox
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd12-31,32新疑问?

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2006-10-20 21:02:00 | 只看该作者

居然看了moomoo前辈的帖子 仰视

32#
发表于 2007-2-6 08:42:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得,可以从reach在这里的用法,来判定是A or E.

reach 这里应该是名词: "延伸”

既然是名词,根据用法和句子的意思应该是套用reach of 而不是reach for.

reach for 通常是reach 作动词的时候的搭配。

33#
发表于 2007-6-3 11:21:00 | 只看该作者

E选项的确是有逻辑问题,难道此题无解?

34#
发表于 2007-6-3 11:26:00 | 只看该作者
个人认为,E如果改成***, since gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by erosion, prehistoric movement, and volcanic activity put gold literally within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel. 逻辑上就清楚了;
35#
发表于 2007-6-11 07:45:00 | 只看该作者

I agree A. Here is my thought about E:

If E is correct, lets try to only examine the subject, verb and object of the main clause:

.. letters ..., ... , outnumber her letters to anyone else.

I think it is apparently illogical if saying "letters outnumber letters to other letters". So E is wrong.

A is good, since the gerund "outnumbering" refers to the whole event described in the previous sentence. And that event makes her letters more than to anyone else. At least logically make sense to me.

Open to discuss.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-11 7:47:03编辑过]
36#
发表于 2007-6-11 07:48:00 | 只看该作者

I agree A. Here is my thought about E:

If E is correct, lets try to only examine the subject, verb and object of the main clause:

.. letters ..., ... , outnumber her letters to anyone else.

I think it is apparently illogical if saying "letters outnumber letters to other letters". So E is wrong.

A is good, since the gerund "outnumbering" refers to the whole event described in the previous sentence. And that event makes her letters more than to anyone else. At least logically make sense to me.

Open to discuss.

37#
发表于 2007-10-22 19:14:00 | 只看该作者

仔细考虑,我认为31题的答案选择E而不是A,分词结构放在句尾,只有两种成分:伴随状语或修饰语,做修饰语只能修饰紧跟的名词,显然,outnumbering不能作为修饰语,只能做伴随状语。

那么,你认为were written能够影响outnumbering么,outnumbering显然不是written的一个伴随结果,故排除A

38#
发表于 2008-2-6 08:47:00 | 只看该作者
http://www.usee.com.tw/driven/blog_article.asp?id=7114。这里给的32的答案是D,

选E的同学你们翻译的累不累,能说服自己吗,D三个并列的因素的综合作用导致那个结果,这才是合情合理的。
而E的翻译完全就是说E正确后很无赖的翻译啊,那三个并列哈意义都没有了啊。

至于since接句子我不懂。

39#
发表于 2008-9-3 11:13:00 | 只看该作者
since即使连词也是副词还是介词,做介词时,就可以加名词,为什么大家一致认为一定要加句子???
40#
发表于 2008-10-2 23:21:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得逻辑意思上(结合语法上)来说,DE都有问题
    

D 是比较贴近正确的逻辑意思的,很明显,erosionprehistoric movementvolcanic activity是同类事物,可以构成并列,而“由于火山作用上升的含金子的河床”没有“火山活动”更贴切。而且,注意,that引导的定语从句谓语用的是thrust,复数,修饰前面三个名词,说明erosionprehistoric movementvolcanic activity的共同作用是河床上升,紧接着一个伴随结果
        
putting gold literally within
reach for.


    

D的不足之处就是since,引导原因状语从句时是连词,应该跟句子,这里去掉that就好了。Since做介词时表示“自从“
        
。还有within the reach of sb是固定搭配。


    
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 01:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部