ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 791|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教2001-08阅读第24题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-1 13:19:00 | 只看该作者

请教2001-08阅读第24题

请教2001-08阅读第24题


就是那篇关于科学、技术和工业三者之间的文章,答案是B,我觉得好像四个答案都不太对,不过总要选一个,大家看呢?

沙发
发表于 2004-10-1 15:07:00 | 只看该作者
最好贴出来,这样好讨论
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-10-1 15:22:00 | 只看该作者

还好手上的是word版。^_^

Questions 20-28

The interrelationship of science, technology, and industry is taken for granted

today—summed up, not altogether accurately, as "research and development." Yet

historically this widespread faith in the economic virtues of science is a relatively recent

Line phenomenon, dating back in the United States about 150 years, and in the Western world

(5) as a whole not over 300 years at most. Even in this current era of large scale, intensive

research and development, the interrelationships involved in this process are frequently

misunderstood. Until the coming of the Industrial Revolution, science and technology

evolved for the most part independently of each other. Then as industrialization became

increasingly complicated, the craft techniques of preindustrial society gradually gave way

(10) to a technology based on the systematic application of scientific knowledge and scientific

methods. This changeover started slowly and progressed unevenly. Until late in the

nineteenth century, only a few industries could use scientific techniques or cared about

using them. The list expanded noticeably after 1870, but even then much of what passed

for the application of science was "engineering science" rather than basic science.

(15) Nevertheless, by the middle of the nineteenth century, the rapid expansion of scientific

knowledge and of public awareness-if not understanding-of it had created a belief that the

advance of science would in some unspecified manner automatically generate economic

benefits. The widespread and usually uncritical acceptance of this thesis led in turn to the

assumption that the application of science to industrial purposes was a linear process, starting

(20) with fundamental science, then proceeding to applied science or technology, and through

them to industrial use. This is probably the most common pattern, but it is not invariable. New

areas of science have been opened up and fundamental discoveries made as a result of

attempts to solve a specific technical or economic problem. Conversely, scientists who mainly

do basic research also serve as consultants on projects that apply research in practical ways.

(25) In sum, the science-technology-industry relationship may flow in several different ways, and

the particular channel it will follow depends on the individual situation. It may at times even

be multidirectional.

24. The understanding of research and

development in the late nineteenth

century is based on which of the

following?

(A) Engineering science is not very

important.

(B) Fundamental science naturally leads

to economic benefits.

(C) The relationship between research

and development should be

criticized.

(D) Industrial needs should determine

what areas fundamental science

focuses on.

地板
发表于 2004-10-1 16:08:00 | 只看该作者
今天头晕了,明天看
5#
发表于 2004-10-1 23:51:00 | 只看该作者
选Bby the middle of the nineteenth century, the rapid expansion of scientific

knowledge and of public awareness-if not understanding-of it had created a belief that the

advance of science would in some unspecified manner automatically generate economic

benefits.应该说的挺清楚的吧,JJ认为哪有问题

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-7 05:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部