以下是引用sendme在2004-9-28 6:34:00的发言:Exposure to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides causes allergic reactions in some children. Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? - The number of school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased over the past ten years.
- Children who are allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have allergies to other substances.
- Children who have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
- The chemicals are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment buildings in Renston.
- Children attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.
answer is C, but i can't figure out the difference between B and C. pls let me know. 这题中,ade 都是无关选项,都可以排除 就是b和c之间的选择, 一开始看b好像是排除他因, 排除是其他物质引起过敏,但是仔细看看题目,上面说Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years. 说明已经是那种物质的过敏, 所以b说关于其他物质的过敏就是无关选项了, 而c说,送去校医那里的病的程度都是差不多的,不会说十年前是病的差不多休克才送去校医那里,而现在是有点症状就送去校医那里,排除了程度上的不同, 是原文的assumption |