ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

By competing with rodents for seeds, black ants help control rodent populations that pose a public health risk. However, a very aggressive species of blank ant, the Loma ant, which has recently invaded a certain region, has a venomous sting that is often fatal to humans. Therefore, the planned introduction into that region of ant flies, which prey on Loma ants, would benefit public health.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3204|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-13-31一道逻辑题,求大神指教!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-5-1 15:38:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-13-31
By competing with rodents for seeds, black ants help control rodent populations that pose a public health risk.  However, a very aggressive species of blank ant, the Loma ant, which has recently invaded a certain region, has a venomous sting that is often fatal to humans.  Therefore, the planned introduction into that region of ant flies, which prey on Loma ants, would benefit public health.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Ant flies do not attack black ants other than Loma ants.
B. Loma ants are less effective than many bird species in competing with rodents for seeds.
C. Certain other species of black ants are more effective than Loma ants in competing with rodents for seeds.
D. The sting of Loma ants can also be fatal to rodents.
E. The use of pesticides to control Loma ants could have harmful effects on the environment.


GWD上的答案给的是A,我选的是C
我觉得A与题中的话“which prey on Loma ants”
而C选项说,其他的蚂蚁比L更高效,也就是说消灭了L不会使与rodent的竞争变弱而影响公共健康,排除它因,从而加强了结论啊,那为什么不能选C呢??


还求大神指教啊!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-5-1 16:15:31 | 只看该作者
My methodto deal with CR problem is to deal with the stimulus first and then look at the question stem and finally the choices.
To better crack the CR problemyou must learn to diagram.

Premiseblack ants help control rodent that pose a public health risk.conducive to humanPremisea very aggressive species of blank antLoma antis harmful to humans.
Conclusionthe planned introduction into that region of ant flies, which prey onLoma ants, would benefitpublic health.


You must first consider if thereis any reasoning error present.how can the author conclude this statementIs there any possibility thatauthordo not considerin order for his argument to be
solidit must take for granted that the introduction of flies will not kill black antswhich play an important rolein public health.

C is a typically wrong answer.Thereis other species existing play no role in evaluating this argument. Assume C isthe scenario,can the argument be more strongwhat is the properties of this kind of antwould they pose health risk tohumanif YESthen is the flies can also control itIf NOthere is no such a need for control.the argument is superfluous.Since the informationin the passage is limitedany speculative statement is untrue..
板凳
发表于 2012-5-1 16:31:22 | 只看该作者
非NN 不过当初也错过这个题。。。 楼上已经回复的很好啦 我就补充一个自己改错本上的图

[attachimg]99828[/attachimg]

绿色的是结论 任何作用于逻辑链外面的东西都是错误的
偶们经常看到的一种错误选项的表达 类似 A is the only way to do it...or A is more likely to do it 也是同样的道理  我们只在乎promise --- conclusion的作用是否成立 不在乎其他的东东

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-2 09:10:39 | 只看该作者
My methodto deal with CR problem is to deal with the stimulus first and then look at the question stem and finally the choices.
To better crack the CR problemyou must learn to diagram.

Premiseblack ants help control rodent that pose a public health risk.conducive to humanPremisea very aggressive species of blank antLoma antis harmful to humans.
Conclusionthe planned introduction into that region of ant flies, which prey onLoma ants, would benefitpublic health.


You must first consider if thereis any reasoning error present.how can the author conclude this statementIs there any possibility thatauthordo not considerin order for his argument to be
solidit must take for granted that the introduction of flies will not kill black antswhich play an important rolein public health.

C is a typically wrong answer.Thereis other species existing play no role in evaluating this argument. Assume C isthe scenario,can the argument be more strongwhat is the properties of this kind of antwould they pose health risk tohumanif YESthen is the flies can also control itIf NOthere is no such a need for control.the argument is superfluous.Since the informationin the passage is limitedany speculative statement is untrue..
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/5/1 16:15:31)



恩恩....好像是理解了,貌似是我太想当然了,用原文没有提供的信息作为答案了...囧rz...谢谢大牛牛~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-2 09:11:20 | 只看该作者
非NN 不过当初也错过这个题。。。 楼上已经回复的很好啦 我就补充一个自己改错本上的图

99828

绿色的是结论 任何作用于逻辑链外面的东西都是错误的
偶们经常看到的一种错误选项的表达 类似 A is the only way to do it...or A is more likely to do it 也是同样的道理  我们只在乎promise --- conclusion的作用是否成立 不在乎其他的东东
-- by 会员 199249712 (2012/5/1 16:31:22)



谢一个谢一个~终于领会鸟...囧rz...~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-11 23:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部