ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7820|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-A-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-27 10:30:00 | 只看该作者

大全-A-5

5.     Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.


Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?


(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.


(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.


(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.


(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.B



(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.


有读懂的xdjm能给解释一下这段话的意思吗? 谢谢



沙发
发表于 2004-9-29 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

J在断言早一些的对于D的诗歌编者 都歪曲了她的意图的时候他是有坚实基础的,可是J自己的文字事实上也还是一种歪曲.为了使D那些经常使用无法辨认的手写标点规范化而统一使用Dash是随意使用的修辞手法的D所不愿看到的,也就是说J统一使用Dash是D从来没有明显倾向选择的(所以J也歪曲,但是程度上要轻一些, 所以A不对,由于没有指明早一些的编者如何处理D的标点,E不对)同样C和D错

板凳
发表于 2004-11-30 16:37:00 | 只看该作者
还是不大明白,请指教,谢谢:)
地板
发表于 2004-12-2 14:55:00 | 只看该作者
juliaPL解释得很好!!
5#
发表于 2004-12-4 23:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wshyee在2004-11-30 16:37:00的发言:
还是不大明白,请指教,谢谢:)


Jmm已经解释的很好了啊,还有什么不明白的?写出来
6#
发表于 2004-12-7 00:28:00 | 只看该作者

A 为什么不对?文中没有看出来程度上要轻一些。

请指教!谢谢:)

7#
发表于 2006-7-10 13:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stopby在2004-12-7 0:28:00的发言:

A 为什么不对?文中没有看出来程度上要轻一些。

请指教!谢谢:)

according to the given inofrmation, we could not be able to make a conclusiton that distortions are equally serious.

The author's emphasis is after the word "YET".  The author aimed to clarify that although Johnson criticized on the other's misleading work, himself was also suffering from the similar distortion problem.

8#
发表于 2006-10-20 04:28:00 | 只看该作者

文中说了,Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text...更加忠实于原著的

所以A中equally不对

9#
发表于 2006-10-23 10:30:00 | 只看该作者

Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion

个人觉得后面的表述都是为了解释这个~~就是j是怎么样distortD的poetry的~~~

10#
发表于 2006-12-1 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

wrong direction

This question is about the main purpose of the paragraph.

So our first reaction is not to analyze the correctness of each answer sentence itself, but what illustrate the main purpose. I think it is hard to find the minor mistake of the word"equally" when in high pressure of test.

The main purpose should be either from the first two sentence, as in most cases, which are more generalized, or from the rest part. In this case, the gravity of the paragraph goes to the second part.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 05:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部