[求拍] ISSUE 108， 恳请同道中人指点迷津！！

kkkacfly

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

The announcer claims that in any given field, except the critical judgment confronted by the expert in that field, the rest are of little value for its work. There is no denying that the experts’ judgments are useful for the work in their own field, however, the author fails to properly estimate the critical judgments which come from the populace.
Critical judgment, just like any available assessment in general, is so paramount that it becomes a crucial mean to postulate the possibility and value of work in its field. Compared with ordinary people, experts own specific knowledge and have been engaged in their regions for decades, what’s more, some of them even have established extinguished accomplishments in their field, either. Admittedly, with their specific cogitation as well as deliberately reasoning, their critical judgment on the work in their domain should be taken into consideration. Their judgment, functions well to presume the possibility and value. For example, the expert in pharmacy can judge if a coming medicine has lethal side effect before put into production. However, it is unthinkable for a common person to do the expert’s job instead.
Besides experts who determine the right-or-wrong of work in their field, in a parallel way, the populace’s critical judgment is also effective, deciding the pragmatic feasibility of the work. As far as concerned, even if the critical judgment from expert claims that a certain theory, technology, or creation is theoretic possible, it doesn’t mean that the creation can be put into use, for it may disobey the interest of common people. For instance, although the technology of clone has been proved probable, it violates the ethic of human and should only be used for research purpose, rather than cloning people themselves. Also, a literary work which wins the critical judgment from experts but fails to be appreciated by populace can hardly be regarded as a canon.
In conclusion, as it is clearly expatiated above, the critical judgments of expert and populace are both valuable for work in any field. The experts give their judgment on behalf of scientific possibility, while the populace’s judge its pragmatic feasibility. Either of them can be ignored when judging the work in any certain field.

竹林中人

感觉你写的比较少啊，这样的一个题目，如果具体化的会好写很多，比如有些领域专业性很强，一般人是难以给出有用的意见的，比如油画等艺术类的，而另一些领域比如产品研发，必须以普通人的意见为准绳，最后有必要说明的是随着信息的交流方便了，普通人的了解深入了，现在很多的领域专家和普通人的意见都有分量，相互补充，会更好

kkkacfly

感觉你写的比较少啊，这样的一个题目，如果具体化的会好写很多，比如有些领域专业性很强，一般人是难以给出有用的意见的，比如油画等艺术类的，而另一些领域比如产品研发，必须以普通人的意见为准绳，最后有必要说明的是随着信息的交流方便了，普通人的了解深入了，现在很多的领域专家和普通人的意见都有分量，相互补充，会更好

-- by 会员 竹林中人 (2012/4/27 9:32:30)

谢谢斑竹提议！