ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7197|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] gwd 9-35

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-25 13:25:00 | 只看该作者

[求助] gwd 9-35

请问第35题答案为什么是C呢?



很抱歉,第九套是pdf格式的,禁掉了copy

沙发
发表于 2004-12-2 08:24:00 | 只看该作者

The first paragraph states that some scientists believe it's warm-blooded. But because of the discovery of growth rings, this statement is being questioned.

By the way, does anyone know why the answer of 33 is D. I have read the essay several times, still don't buy it. BTW, I think it's the hardest RC I've done so far regarding GWD.

板凳
发表于 2004-12-8 14:41:00 | 只看该作者

33-D中说作者认为根据其他科学家的后续发现,可以推出R提出的Caution“不应立即判断恐龙是热血动物。”是有正当理由的(warranted)。与原文相符。

地板
发表于 2004-12-8 14:45:00 | 只看该作者
建议斑竹把本贴加入GWD阅读链接汇总。
5#
发表于 2005-1-17 13:59:00 | 只看该作者

顺便把全文贴上

GWD-9-Q33 to GWD-9-Q36:

Scientists studying the physiology

of dinosaurs have long debated whether

dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.

Line  Those who suspect they were warm-

(5)   blooded point out that dinosaur bone

is generally fibro-lamellar in nature;

because fibro-lamellar bone is formed

quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are

laid down haphazardly. Consistent with

(10)  their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded

animals, such as birds and mammals,

tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone,

whereas reptiles, which are slowgrowing

and cold-blooded, generally

(15)  produce bone in which fibrils are laid

down parallel to each other. Moreover,

like the bone of birds and mammals,

dinosaur bone tends to be highly

vascularized, or filled with blood

(20)  vessels. These characteristics,

first recognized in the 1930’s,

were documented in the 1960’s by

de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized,

fibro-lamellar bone in several

(25)  groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s,

Bakker cited these characteristics as

evidence for the warm-bloodedness of

dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged

caution, arguing for an intermediate type

(30)  of dinosaur physiology, a generation of

paleontologists has come to believe

that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.

In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s

contention began to be questioned, as a

(35)  number of scientists found growth rings

in the bones of various dinosaurs that

are much like those in modern reptiles.

Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in

nature, producing a series of concentric

(40)  rings in the bone, not unlike the growth

rings of a tree. Recently, Chinsamy

investigated the bones of two dinosaurs

from the early Jurassic period

(208-187 million years ago), and found

(45)  that these bones also had growth rings;

however, they were also partially fibrolamellar

in nature. Chinsamy’s work

raises a question central to the debate

over dinosaur physiology: did dino-

(50)  saurs form fibro-lamellar bone because

of an innately high metabolic rate associated

with warm-bloodedness or

because of periods of unusually fast

growth that occurred under favorable

(55)  environmental conditions? (Although

modern reptiles generally do not form

fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodiles

raised under optimal environmental

conditions do.) This question remains

(60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence

into account, one cannot make

a definitive statement about dinosaur

physiology on the basis of dinosaur

bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an

(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure

because their physiology was neither

typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GWD-9-Q33:

The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged

by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was

A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès

B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers

C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time

D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists

E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy

Answer:

对这题确实感到很疑惑,看了msfox的帖子,再仔细看了全文,才注意到只有两个地方提到intermediate pattern/type,对于R提出的Caution,作者是正面态度,但这题ETS实在狡猾,看到最后一句总结语时,早就把这茬给忘了,下回作题怎么避免呀?想问NN。。

还有given certain subsequent findings of other scientists,但后面只有一个发现呀?(L44  Chinsamy found)
6#
发表于 2005-4-1 15:25:00 | 只看该作者

To 楼上:段内小转折,对比取非即可。A选项unjustified: de Ricqlès自己说的要"caution"怎么会和自己的claim相左?

另外,看到大家都没讨论34T,我来问一下:

34 The primary purpose of the passage is to

D. evaluate the claim that dinasors bone tissue provides evidence for the warm-bloodedness of dinasors

E. resolve the disagreement between de Ricqlès and Bakker over the nature of dinasor physiology.

给的答案是D。E为什么不对?

本文第一句话:

Scientists studying the physiology

of dinosaurs have long debated whether

dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.

和最后一句话:

This question remains

(60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence

into account, one cannot make

a definitive statement about dinosaur

physiology on the basis of dinosaur

bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an

(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure

because their physiology was neither

typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.

这不是将de Ricqlès and Bakker 的观点折中了一下,认为恐龙即非reptilian, mammalian, nor avian么?

7#
发表于 2005-4-2 08:49:00 | 只看该作者
help!
8#
发表于 2005-4-24 22:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ringcheng在2005-4-1 15:25:00的发言:

To 楼上:段内小转折,对比取非即可。A选项unjustified: de Ricqlès自己说的要"caution"怎么会和自己的claim相左?


另外,看到大家都没讨论34T,我来问一下:


34 The primary purpose of the passage is to


D. evaluate the claim that dinasors bone tissue provides evidence for the warm-bloodedness of dinasors


E. resolve the disagreement between de Ricqlès and Bakker over the nature of dinasor physiology.


给的答案是D。E为什么不对?


Chinsamy’s work raises a question central to the debate over dinosaur physiology: .



This question remains unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence into account, one cannot make a definitive statement about dinosaur physiology on the basis of dinosaur bone.


楼上mm请注意黑体字部分


况且the disagreement between de Ricqlès and Bakker 在文中也看不出来,文中只是说 Although de Ricqlès urged caution,


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-24 22:38:13编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-9-22 00:04:00 | 只看该作者
33题,warranted(证明,如果不当“正当理由”讲的话)和 may be, remains unanswerd不冲突吗?
10#
发表于 2006-5-21 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

是“caution was warrented”,unanswered的是debate over dinosaur physiology。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-29 10:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部