ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sofarsgood
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 9-11

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-6-17 16:30:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上的观点,


选A

22#
发表于 2005-6-17 16:39:00 | 只看该作者

10 C


11 A


10题中A选项Older production technologies cannot be adapted so as to reduce production of these outputs as waste products.文章并没有指出说不使用老技术是为了降低waste。而只是说新法律增加了工厂的cost,新工厂避免使用老技术。


C选项Although these outputs are environmentally hazardous, some plants still generate them as waste products despite the high compliance costs they impose.



原文中就这么两句话:New regulations have imposed extensive compliance costs on companies still using older industrial coal-fired burners that generate high sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide outputs, for example, whereas new facilities generally avoid processes that would create such waste products


所有选项应该从这两句话里得出来,而不能自己推论。


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-17 16:48:27编辑过]
23#
发表于 2005-6-18 11:09:00 | 只看该作者
A  




older production
technologies often
continue to generate
toxic wastes
that were not regulated when the
(30) technology was first adopted


紧扣题目,,,


C是迷惑选项。。。older production



technologies often



continue to generate toxic wastes



that were not regulated when the



(30 )  technology was first adopted.

C 与二氧化硫无关。。。是一种概述,不是具体情况。。。

24#
发表于 2005-6-23 15:11:00 | 只看该作者

本来我也选C,但看了大家的讨论,再回头仔细读几遍文章,我觉得答案A是正确的,原文应该回视定位在这句,特别是whereas引导的转折。


New regulations have imposed extensive compliance costs on companies still using older industrial coal-fired burners that generate high sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide outputs, for example, whereas new facilities generally avoid processes that would create such waste products.


这句转折我在第一编看文章的时候没大留意,但是大家想想这个转折句传达了什么样的信息?


新的设备避免了制造废物的流程(隐含内容:从而也就降低了环保成本)


转折句之前呢?是说这些老设备面临着课以重税的风险。


那么新老设备之间的强对比,不正说明了老设备无法改造从而降低环保成本么?如果老设备可以改造,那么原文也就不用浪费笔墨来说新设备怎样怎样。。。

25#
发表于 2005-8-22 23:47:00 | 只看该作者

我也弃C投A了。


31-36是说对still用老技术的企业课税,而c说老企业虽然被课税still用老技术


还是有点点区别的

26#
发表于 2005-8-30 18:39:00 | 只看该作者

Q11:



The passage suggests which of the following concerning the relationship between the location of a plant and the compliance costs it faces?






A. A plant is less likely to face high compliance costs if it is located near larger plants that are in violation of environmental regulations.



B. An isolated plant is less likely to draw the attention of environmental regulators, resulting in lower compliance costs.



C. A large plant that is located near other large facilities will most probably be forced to pay high compliance costs.



D. A small plant that is located near a number of larger plants will be forced to absorb some of its neighbors’ compliance costs.



E. A plant will often escape high compliance costs if it is located far away from environmental regulatory agencies.

大家都討論10


關於11的A我是怎麼也找不到定位點????



幫幫我吧

27#
发表于 2005-8-30 18:49:00 | 只看该作者
见第4、8楼。
28#
发表于 2005-9-2 19:00:00 | 只看该作者

New regulations have imposed extensive compliance costs on companies still using older industrial coal-fired burners that generate high sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide outputs


C. Although these outputs are environmentally hazardous, some plants still generate them as waste products despite the high compliance costs they impose


C不就是这句话的改写吗,文中原意是新规则罚了用老技术的企业,其含义是当然是有企业用才能罚呀,没有企业用了,就谈不到罚不罚的了。

29#
发表于 2005-10-6 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

Q10  选A吧。。呵呵。。


C的错误是:Although these outputs are environmentally hazardous, some plants still generate them as waste products despite the high compliance costs they impose


文中其实说的是:small plant 改变了燃烧。。。。例如原先是禁止coal fire burner,,所以small plant 改成了某个××××××虽然这没有列入紧用的行列。。但还是会制造污染气体。。。然而他因为没有被regulation 禁用。所以他没有面临compliance costs ......所以C错。


A正确的原因是:在regulation 在下,,,small 只能采取改装的方法来投机取巧。虽然这种技术没有被禁用,但是还是会造成污染。。。(如果说可以改造成不产生污染的技术吧,那就会去改造)。。所以说没有这个能力或者说不适合改造选A。

30#
发表于 2005-10-6 15:33:00 | 只看该作者

感悟一下。。。阅读就是逻辑啊。。!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-17 01:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部