ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were. Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere. After the fragments' entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1928|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑机经宇航员这道争议题,应该选谁?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-3-22 16:56:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course withJupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter'satmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.】 In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomersstudied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere.  These analyses revealed unprecedented tracesof sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainlycontained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmospheredoes contain sulfur.  Since sulfurwould have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetratedthis cloud layer,it is likely that someof the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter'souter atmosphere without being burned up.
In the astronomer's argument, the twoportions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a claim that the astronomerseeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighsagainst the truth of that claim.
B. The first is a claim that the astronomerseeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth ofthat claim.
C. The first and the second are each considerationsadvanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
D. The first provides evidence in support ofthe conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
E. The first is a circumstance for which theastronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges aconsideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer


机经上给的答案D。假设真正的粗体部分就是这样,我认为选c,原文粉色的部分是结论。
请教各位的看法
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-3-22 17:16:39 | 只看该作者
It's all about the fragments size, so D is correct
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-22 17:26:07 | 只看该作者
那么前半句but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmospheredoes contain sulfur.

应该怎么理解呢?这个不是结论么?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-22 18:09:59 | 只看该作者
upup
5#
发表于 2012-3-22 20:11:26 | 只看该作者
我看的版本,怎么机经上答案就是C
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-22 20:40:17 | 只看该作者
也有说d,到底哪个比较好呢?
都是正向的,不太好区分
7#
发表于 2012-3-22 21:33:27 | 只看该作者
JJ上写的考古是GWD原题,考的是变体
也就是说,原文是一样的,但是BF的部分不一样,底下的链接有原题的讨论贴
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-3-22 21:46:21 | 只看该作者
我有看呀~~跟GWD划线部分不一样,
发这个贴就是想问一下如果是这样划线的话,应该是各起到什么作用的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 11:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部