一道题求解答

小吉要加油

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

(A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.

(B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.

(C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.

(D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.

(E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.

答案D

但是觉得E更直接 直接说数量是判断的标准 怎么排出呢。。

倩猫记

E是直接相关。但是它没有排除quality的相关性。也就是说E没有结合全文，丢掉了quality。逻辑和阅读有一个相同的点在于第一个转折后的内容才为主结论。所以在一个逻辑的原文中如果有转折，是不可能丢掉转折后的意思的。

小吉要加油

E是直接相关。但是它没有排除quality的相关性。也就是说E没有结合全文，丢掉了quality。逻辑和阅读有一个相同的点在于第一个转折后的内容才为主结论。所以在一个逻辑的原文中如果有转折，是不可能丢掉转折后的意思的。

-- by 会员 倩猫记 (2012/3/21 22:21:57)

好专业，谢谢啦

ainiAnnie

我觉得你对问题的理解可能有点偏差。
作者认为 要准确计算服务业的效率 是非常复杂的，用 postal  作为例子来说明自己的观点（即计算复杂的观点）。作者挑战“送信送的越多效率越高”并同时提出自己的疑问，题目的意思是 作者提出反对意见的是基于对选项中哪一个的质疑？
E 作者是同意的，显然没有质疑。