GWD-5-19

ptr07

pay attention to "Therefor", after this word, the author clearly states his conclusion

dreamalittle

以下是引用amber0919在2006-4-21 12:53:00的发言：

这个题有个快捷方法.第二个黑体部分明显是结论.所以从选项的尾部看:

ABE都说是consideration.明显不对.排.

D:说是assumption.也不对.排.

只有C:说是position. 结论.对.

完全同意，我也是这么选出来的

jason_jufe

以下是引用roberto0220在2005-6-27 20:39:00的发言：

七楼的mm可否举个实例演示下？

我也会尝试你的方法看看。

1.        GWD-6-Q16*: Boldface

Historian:  Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus.  Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques.  It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent.  Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics.  Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false.  A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however.  Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

 

In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

1. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.

2. The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.

3. The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.

4. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.

5. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.

Some scholars have argued that since…and since… conclusion however. Leibniz….presented

很清晰地看出，since后是给scholars的理论提供evidence；后面转折提出作者自己观点，后面也提出evidence支持自己的观点。

zxl851003

很好的例子

weideng

以下是引用jojocarter在2004-9-17 11:19:00的发言：

也就是说其实2并没有否定1，相反2的推出必须建立在纪录是完整的基础上的。所以也只有C是对的。

很经典~谢谢

jonath

"这句怎么翻译？

Village census records for the last half of the 1600’s are remarkably complete."

答：15世纪下半叶该村的人口普查记录惊人的完整

jesuisdesole

一看BF就晕了

那个牛牛能给我讲讲为啥前半句的ASSUMPTION不对呢?

batmanhm

以下是引用jesuisdesole在2008-5-14 0:23:00的发言：

一看BF就晕了

那个牛牛能给我讲讲为啥前半句的ASSUMPTION不对呢?

    陈诉句亚，没有assumption的意思，只是叙述一个事实

rpch2004

否定反驳结论，并非等于否定支持反驳结论的前提，有可能最终结论也是建立在这个前提之上

第二个BF在Therefore，之后，明显是结论，可以用来排除选项

夜凉如水

否定了一个观点并不等于否定了这个观点的前提

谢谢。