一道LSAT题

lawyer_1

其实我觉得对与错都无关，关键是它透露出题人的思路，对与错的界限在哪里，因为我们要做他们出的题，就要按他们的思路去想

LES

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-9-7 21:38:00的发言：
其实我觉得对与错都无关，关键是它透露出题人的思路，对与错的界限在哪里，因为我们要做他们出的题，就要按他们的思路去想

大哥，考试的时候只要偶们点四个圈圈！

快公布答案吧！当然一定要说明理由。

谢谢先！

ztlbox

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-9-6 10:31:00的发言：

一道LSAT题供讨论，等后再公布答案和原因

In a recent poll of chief executive officers(CEOs) of 125 large corporations, the overwhelming majority claimed that employee training and welfare is of the same high priority as customer satisfication. So the popular belief that the top management of large corporations behaves indifferently to the needs and aspirations of employees is unfounded.

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it

A)  fails to define adequately the term "top management"

B)  presumes, without giving justification, that one is not indifferent to something that one considers a top priority

C)   presumes, without giving justification, that the CEOs' priorities tend to be misplaced

D)   presumes, without giving justification, that the CEOs' claims are reflected in actual practice

E)  makes a generalization based on an unrepresentative sample

E, 我的最爱。

D不好的原因是：the CEOs' claims are reflected in actual practice 是可以成立的，我认为trainning and wellfare是重要的，并不一定就非要去做什么，我真地认为每天节食很重要，但并不意味着我一定要一天只吃一顿。这是现实情况嘛，不矛盾的。

E差不多是一句放之逻辑题四海而皆准的大白话，要WEAKEN, 我说你的论据不具代表性，所以不能推出结论。一点错都没有。

lawyer_1

TO LES，别那末急，多想一下印象才深刻。其实我认为明白了出题人的对错界限，才能形成一种直觉，很快排出混淆项，因为时间多的是花在混淆项上，解决了这个问题，速度就上来了，当然要解决这个问题，除了明白出替人的对错界限外，还要理解水平跟得上，这才是逻辑最难的。

mindfree

B.

To weaken an argument, you have to find the reason that is particular to the argument. D and E can be used to weaken any argument. For example: Tom says that Cathy is hot. So Tom must like her. We can always argue that Tom might or might not tell the truth. But this reasoning is not particular to this argument. The reasoning is how to bridge "hot" and "like". Same for E. If th argument is using a sample of 5 corporations, we can safely say that it is not representative. However, 125 is quite a sample.

B is particular to this argument because it questions the bridge between "indifferent" and "high priority".

LES

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-9-8 0:02:00的发言：
TO LES，别那末急，多想一下印象才深刻。其实我认为明白了出题人的对错界限，才能形成一种直觉，很快排出混淆项，因为时间多的是花在混淆项上，解决了这个问题，速度就上来了，当然要解决这个问题，除了明白出替人的对错界限外，还要理解水平跟得上，这才是逻辑最难的。

流沙

mindfree, lawyer_1和leeon都是我偶像

rhod

以下是引用mindfree在2004-9-8 2:47:00的发言：

B.

To weaken an argument, you have to find the reason that is particular to the argument. D and E can be used to weaken any argument. For example: Tom says that Cathy is hot. So Tom must like her. We can always argue that Tom might or might not tell the truth. But this reasoning is not particular to this argument. The reasoning is how to bridge "hot" and "like". Same for E. If th argument is using a sample of 5 corporations, we can safely say that it is not representative. However, 125 is quite a sample.

B is particular to this argument because it questions the bridge between "indifferent" and "high priority".

获益匪浅呐!

leeon

以下是引用流沙在2004-9-8 16:26:00的发言：
mindfree, lawyer_1和leeon都是我偶像

MM，我可不敢和mindfree、lawyer_1相提并论啊，他们才是超级NN，我还是个处在痛苦挣扎中的菜鸟！

流沙

以下是引用leeon在2004-9-8 16:32:00的发言：

MM，我可不敢和mindfree、lawyer_1相提并论啊，他们才是超级NN，我还是个处在痛苦挣扎中的菜鸟！

相信你一定会成为NN的，看这些版上的帖子就知道了～～～＋U