Although the earliest surviving Greek inscriptions written in an alphabet date from the eighth century B.C., the fact that the text of these Greek inscriptions sometimes runs from right to left and sometimes from left to right[evidence] indicates that the Greeks adopted alphabetic writing at least two centuries before these inscriptions were produced[结论]. After all, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and presumably, along with the alphabet, they also adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text. And although Phoenician writing was originally inconsistent in direction, by the eighth century B.C. Phoenician was consistently written from right to left and had been for about two centuries.[evidence]
我想问问 After all, the Greeks learned alphabetic writing from the Phoenicians, and presumably, along with the alphabet, they also adopted the then-current Phoenician practice with respect to the direction of text. 这句是什么作用啊 属于background 还是 premise？ 是不是可以认为是premise然后那两个evidence是支持他的？不然为什么那两个是evidence而不是premise啊？ 各位nn求解答T T 感激感激~~
I think there is no absolutely difference between evidence and premise. Do not be so serious about these.
Yes, I think the sentence just play a role of explaining since if you eliminate the sentence you still get all evidence you need to make the conclusion but the argument is just a little confusing for a reader without any background knowleage.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-3-6 20:34:30
收藏
收藏
楼主
