LSAT-2-2-12

entia

12. People have long been fascinated by the paranormal. Over the years, numerous researchers have investigated telepathy only to find that conclusive evidence for its existence has persistently evaded them. Despite this, there are still those who believe that there must be “something in it” since some research seems to support the view that telepathy exist. However, it can often be shown that other explanations that do comply with known laws can be given. Therefore, it is premature to conclude that telepathy is an alternative means of communication.
In the passage, the author
(A) supports the conclusion by pointing to the inadequacy of evidence for the opposite view
(B) supports the conclusion by describing particular experiments
(C) supports the conclusion by overgeneralizing from a specific piece of evidence
(D) draws a conclusion that is not supported by the premises
(E) rephrases the conclusion without offering any support for it

这道题为什么选a？？ 没有看出来。我对后两句话不是很理解：However, it can often be shown that other explanations that do comply with known laws can be given. Therefore, it is premature to conclude that telepathy is an alternative means of communication.

lawyer_1

作者的观点：说telepathy存在为时过早（T不存在）

推理：因为好像有些研究支持T的存在，所以还有些人相信它的存在。但是，常常其他解释也可用于解释于这些现象（指被这些研究者解释为有T存在的现象）。即解释成有T存在是不充分的。其他解释也说得通，所以：。。。