- UID
- 723645
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-2-18
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Maybe it is true that people have different dictionaries of their own, where the words contained are as disparate as apples and oranges that are beyond comparison: no pandering to the lowest common denominator, the pendulum of public attitude towards the topic that xxxx is still swinging around again and again in the battles of ideas and no one wins to this day. I would not presume to say that ROUGH THESIS with no exception, but having weighed common factors, I will clearly state my opinion that THESIS QUALIFIED
To begin with, REASON 1 Some people go to extremes to insist on unnecessary statistics and details; some people work tirelessly for an inside look at the mathematics behind numbers and statistics. The fact is that we cannot deny that numbers say something. According to the National Statistics magazine’s reports, the latest result of questionnaire concerning TOPIC indicates that the number of students holding the opinion that THESIS led that of students who thought otherwise by a margin of 30 percent, with a margin of error of 5 percent plus or minus.
Also, REASON 2, which is not in want of solid evidence. When I need someone to be there for me and when need someone to beg for advices, he will be there, that is what a mentor always does. He ever gave me some words that I will never relegate to the shredder of oblivion: xxxx. I believe it is true. XXXX
(There will be some words that one will never relegate to the shredder of oblivion: xxxx.)
To add yet another reason to boot, that REASON 3 would not be probably left out.
Admittedly, if some factors, like (that) NEGATIVITY, are ignored deliberately or accidentally, it cannot be a sound analysis that can stand up to close inspection. XXXX. However, these considerations will not make me deliver the vital points of my address without sufficient punch.
While I cannot compare apples and oranges, at least I could compare apples and pears: above the lowest common denominator among still lies a general consensus to reach that REPHRASED THESIS. And this is more convincing on the grounds of the telling analysis made from the perspective of PERSPECTIVE 1, PERSPECTIVE 2, and PERSPECTIVE 3.
|
|