ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania's annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1550|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

急求逻辑jj18!!! 明天考 在线等xdjm解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-2-21 15:16:35 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
18. Tobacco Sales
In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania’s annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. All health care in Gandania is government-funded.

B. Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.

C. The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.

D. Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
E. No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use


答案是?为什么呢? 我觉得是不是c??
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-21 15:16:55 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2012-2-21 15:23:18 | 只看该作者
the answer is A.
地板
发表于 2012-2-21 15:27:25 | 只看该作者
文章说因为政府10%的收入来自烟草,如果政府出台政策限制人们烟草使用,烟草销售减少,那么政府的财政就会有问题.所以政府cannot afford to  institute such laws.

但是烟草造成了越来越多的健康问题(the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years).如果这些医疗都是政府赞助的(选项A),那么如果烟草使用的人减少了,虽然政府收入可能减少,但是大家的smoking-related health problems也会减少,政府在医疗上的花销就会减少,那么财政不一定就会有问题啊.所以weaken the argument
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 10:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部