ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 9000|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-5-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-25 12:42:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-5-2

Q2:



Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.






Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?







  1. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.


  2. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.


  3. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.


  4. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.


  5. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

个人人为: d) 很牵强, 但又无更好的.........


沙发
发表于 2004-8-25 13:00:00 | 只看该作者
Why not B
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-26 07:23:00 | 只看该作者

d) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished    说, 木匠手艺越好, 楼越不易倒. 怎样weakens the guidebook writer?

(but: guidebook writer说, 由1930前 木匠造的楼更花功夫, 更有技术.)

还是我理解有误?

地板
发表于 2004-8-26 09:22:00 | 只看该作者
D要说的是作者看到的都是手艺好的木匠做的,那些手艺不好的早就被拆掉了(质量越好,被拆掉的可能性越小)。所以不能拿过去最好的和现在的多数比,然后就做出结论说过去的手艺比现在好,那是以偏概全
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-26 22:51:43编辑过]
5#
发表于 2004-8-26 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

e,

关键是比较1930前后的问题;

6#
发表于 2004-12-10 21:52:00 | 只看该作者

D,

E为无关选项。

7#
发表于 2005-4-4 11:43:00 | 只看该作者

The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.


怎么反应?D只说building更少可能被误用或毁坏啊。。。怎么感觉象无关选项?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-4 11:43:08编辑过]
8#
发表于 2005-4-4 13:59:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得应该选B那!
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-4 14:07:12编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-4-4 14:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用likui在2005-4-4 13:59:00的发言:
我觉得应该选B那!D是无关选项,E是支持原题的选项。
10#
发表于 2005-8-5 17:21:00 | 只看该作者

不同意D

由D可以推出是拿1930前的好房子和1930后的好房子比,对原文结论没有影响

同意B,容纳更多人可以看成是skill,care,effort的另一种表现


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-5 17:22:49编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 01:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部